a qualitative study of the views of patients with long-term conditions on family doctors in hong kong定性研究的患者长期的观点条件在香港家庭医生.pdfVIP

下载本文档

1
0
约7.43万字
约 11页
2017-09-11 发布于上海
举报
版权申诉

a qualitative study of the views of patients with long-term conditions on family doctors in hong kong定性研究的患者长期的观点条件在香港家庭医生.pdf

1、本文档共11页，可阅读全部内容。
2、原创力文档（book118）网站文档一经付费（服务费），不意味着购买了该文档的版权，仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用，不得用于商业用途，未经授权，严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等，侵权必究。
3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传，本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺！文档内容仅供研究参考，付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费，意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险，本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务；查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档，您可以点击这里二次下载。
4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等，请点击“版权申诉”（推荐），也可以打举报电话：400-050-0827(电话支持时间：9:00-18:30)。
5、该文档为VIP文档，如果想要下载，成为VIP会员后，下载免费。
6、成为VIP后，下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后，不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
7、成为VIP后，您将拥有八大权益，权益包括：VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传，每下载1次，网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等，对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档

a qualitative study of the views of patients with long-term conditions on family doctors in hong kong定性研究的患者长期的观点条件在香港家庭医生

Mercer et al. BMC Family Practice 2010, 11:46 /1471-2296/11/46 R E S E A R C H A R T I C L E Open Access Research article A qualitative study of the views of patients with long-term conditions on family doctors in Hong Kong *1 2 3 4 4 4 2 Stewart W Mercer , Judy Y Siu , Sheila M Hillier , Cindy LK Lam , Yvonne YC Lo , Tai Pong Lam and Sian M Griffiths Abstract Background: Primary care based management of long-term conditions (LTCs) is high on the international healthcare agenda, including the Asia-Pacific region. Hong Kong has a mixed economy healthcare system with both public and private sectors with a range of types of primary care doctors. Recent Hong Kong Government policy aims to enhance the management of LTCs in primary care possibly based on a family doctor model. Patients views on this are not well documented and the aim of the present study was to explore the views of patients with LTCs on family doctors in Hong Kong. Methods: The views of patients (with a variety of LTCs) on family doctors in Hong Kong were explored. Two groups of participants were interviewed; a) those who considered themselves as having a family doctor, b) those who considered themselves as not having a family doctor (either with a regular primary care doctor but not a family doctor or with no regular primary care doctor). In-depth individual semi-structured interviews were carried out with 28 participants (10 with a family doctor, 10 with a regular doctor, and 8 with no regular doctor) and analysed using the constant comparative method. Results: Participants who did not have a family doctor were familiar with the concept but regarded it as a luxury item for the rich within the private healthcare syst