risk adjustment models for interhospital comparison of cs rates using robson’s ten group classification system and other socio-demographic and clinical variables风险调整模型对转诊小组cs率进行比较,利用罗布森的十组分类系统和其他socio-demographic和临床变量.pdfVIP

下载本文档

2
0
约5.79万字
约 8页
2017-09-11 发布于上海
举报
版权申诉

risk adjustment models for interhospital comparison of cs rates using robson’s ten group classification system and other socio-demographic and clinical variables风险调整模型对转诊小组cs率进行比较,利用罗布森的十组分类系统和其他socio-demographic和临床变量.pdf

1、原创力文档（book118）网站文档一经付费（服务费），不意味着购买了该文档的版权，仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用，不得用于商业用途，未经授权，严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等，侵权必究。。
2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传，本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺！文档内容仅供研究参考，付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费，意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险，本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务；查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档，您可以点击这里二次下载。
3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等，请点击“版权申诉”（推荐），也可以打举报电话：400-050-0827(电话支持时间：9:00-18:30)。
4、该文档为VIP文档，如果想要下载，成为VIP会员后，下载免费。
5、成为VIP后，下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后，不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
6、成为VIP后，您将拥有八大权益，权益包括：VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传，每下载1次，网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等，对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档

risk adjustment models for interhospital comparison of cs rates using robson’s ten group classification system and other socio-demographic and clinical variables风险调整模型对转诊小组cs率进行比较,利用罗布森的十组分类系统和其他socio-demographic和临床变量

Colais et al. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2012, 12:54 /1471-2393/12/54 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Risk adjustment models for interhospital comparison of CS rates using Robson’s ten group classification system and other socio-demographic and clinical variables 1* 2 1 2 2 2 2 Paola Colais , Maria P Fantini , Danilo Fusco , Elisa Carretta , Elisa Stivanello , Jacopo Lenzi , Giulia Pieri and Carlo A Perucci3 Abstract Background: Caesarean section (CS) rate is a quality of health care indicator frequently used at national and international level. The aim of this study was to assess whether adjustment for Robson’s Ten Group Classification System (TGCS), and clinical and socio-demographic variables of the mother and the fetus is necessary for inter- hospital comparisons of CS rates. Methods: The study population includes 64,423 deliveries in Emilia-Romagna between January 1, 2003 and December 31, 2004, classified according to theTGCS. Poisson regression was used to estimate crude and adjusted hospital relative risks of CS compared to a reference category. Analyses were carried out in the overall population and separately according to the Robson groups (groups I, II, III, IV and V–X combined). Adjusted relative risks (RR) of CS were estimated using two risk-adjustment models; the first (M1) including the TGCS group as the only adjustment factor; the second (M2) including in addition demographic and clinical confounders identified using a stepwise selection procedure. Percentage variations between crude and adjusted RRs by hospital were calculated to evaluate the confounding effect of covariates. Results: The percentage variations from crude to adjusted RR proved to be similar in M1 and M2 model. However,