人工智能生成内容的著作权认定.pdfVIP

人工智能生成内容的著作权认定 熊 琦 内容提要 ：人工智能在新闻和视觉艺术领域参与创作活动的现象虽然在如今已成常态，但如何认 定由此生成内容的可版权性及其权利归属，在法律上却并未形成统一意见。作为非自然人和法人的人 工智能首次成为内容来源后，如果将该内容认定为受著作权法保护的作品，必将冲击传统著作权的客 体认定标准和权利归属原则，引发权利变动和侵权认定规则的全面混乱。作为激励“理性人”创作和 传播的制度工具，著作权法无法脱离从移植自有体物财产权的制度体系和主客体不得互换的基本私法 原理，因而围绕创作者和投资者构建的制度设计不应也无法因人工智能而被颠覆。作为遵循人工智能 软件设计者意志创作的产物，人工智能生成内容的结果不但仍可由独创性判定标准来认定，权利归属 也应借鉴早已存在且运作成熟的法人作品制度安排，将人工智能的所有者视为著作权人。 关键 词 ：人工智能人工智能生成内容著作权独创性作者 Abstract : Contents that generated by artificial intelligence can be commonly seen in news and art areas today . But whether artificial intelligence generated content copyrightable , and who owns the work of artificial intelligence , is still a controversial problem . Artificial intelligence no doubt is machine which is excluded by copyright authorship. If artificial intelligence generated content can be considered as the work that is protected by copyright , rules of copyright subject matter and ownership will be changed and disturb the basic rules of private law. As an incentive system, copyright law cannot abandon the infringement and transfer doctrine which all are based on traditional subject matter and ownership . In this case , the content generated by artificial intelligence should be considered as work in copyright law. Due to the creativity of artificial intelligence is taught by the designers , those work5s copyright should be owned by the designer of artificial intelligence . Key Words: artificial intelligence ; artificial intelligence generated content ; copyright ; originality ; author 一、问题的提出 改变，新的商业模式不断基于新的作品经济利 益实现途径而出现，由此需要在法律上加以调 机器对于著作权法而言，一直以来仅作为 整，以重新平衡权利人与使用者的利益。人工智 创作和传播的辅助工具存在，在创作行为上仅限 能不同于以往影响著作权法的机器之处，在于其 于代替书写和丰富作品固定于载体的方式，并未