甲午之败败于精神贫弱（Jiawu defeat was defeated by spirit of the poor）.docVIP

甲午之败败于精神贫弱（Jiawu defeat was defeated by spirit of the poor） Jiawu defeat was defeated by spirit of the poor In the Sino Japanese War, the Qing Dynasty is obviously not as good as others suffer a big. We usually say, since the Opium War, China jipinjiruo. This poor and weak is not only the lean and weak of material forces, but also the poverty and weakness in spirit. Jiawu defeat is inevitable to reflect the whole social spiritual decadent and corrupt regime, the army, the state will slump inferior. First of all, the internal friction is endless, the country has no will. The late Qing Dynasty still maintains a huge Dynasty, but has long been split. In particular, the supreme ruling clique has more than one right, openly divided into the two political forces, the so-called emperor party and the post party. Whether it is battle or master and is not focused on national interests and the best interests of the country, but as to contain the opponent, the means to consolidate power. Even during the war, is still in the wolidou. In this political situation, the outcome of the first Sino Japanese war has not been doomed. The Westernization Group formed in the process of setting up the Westernization Movement has a strong feudal separatism. They will each army and the military industrial private property for the group, their own guns, each other. As Liang Qichao said, the official of the Sino Japanese War, and know that the painting Xinjiang sober, view it for private affairs of Zhili and Manchuria of course, the raise rates, a trip to the emergency phase of almost. Without a strong core of leadership, military and local forces sectarianism, self system, and then a big country, is also impossible to concentrate the will of the state lacking spirit of cooperation, and it is impossible to develop a coherent approach to combat, cant be unified deployment of resources, impossible to coordinate all aspects of power. Japanese militarism launched an aggressive war against China, not