广东拟向中央建议管理实行个税浮动制（Guangdong proposed to the central management of the implementation of a tax floating system）.docVIP

广东拟向中央建议管理实行个税浮动制（Guangdong proposed to the central management of the implementation of a tax floating system） Provincial CPPCC members: Guangdong should try to raise the tax threshold, Guangzhou increased to 3000 yuan, Shenzhen increased to 3500 yuan Guangdong Local Taxation Bureau: according to the price level in different regions, it is reasonable to deal with the proposal of adjusting the tax payment threshold separately 2000 yuan standard in Guangdong, the price index, consumer spending areas are significantly lower, it is recommended to adjust the tax threshold according to the price level in different regions. Recently, the Guangdong Provincial Local Taxation Bureau in the reply to the CPPCC proposal, Guangdong will recommend to the Central Committee of the individual income tax wage deduction standard, establish and regional price level, inflation coefficient linked to the floating mechanism. The income gap among residents continues to expand Provincial CPPCC member Huang Xiqin believes that the income distribution system is seriously unreasonable, inhibiting the growth of national consumption. First of all, the national income distribution pattern is irrational. At present, the income of residents in Guangdong Province, especially the income of rural residents, is increasing slowly, which is the important reason that consumption growth lags behind economic growth. Secondly, the continued widening of the income gap among residents is also a major cause of the decline in the consumption rate of residents in Guangdong. The per capita income levels of farmers in eastern Guangdong, northern Guangdong and western Guangdong are only 84%, 78% and 67% of the provinces average, compared with the per capita net income of farmers in the Pearl River Delta region. Guangdong should set the threshold first The economic status of Guangdong province ranked first in the country, the total economy and per capita income inequality, the rich are getting richer and the poor to th