2009年高考诗歌分类鉴赏要诀怀古咏史诗（2009 college entrance examination appreciation tips epic poetry classification）.docVIP

2009年高考诗歌分类鉴赏要诀怀古咏史诗（2009 college entrance examination appreciation tips epic poetry classification） The college entrance examination in 2009 poetry classification -- epic appreciation tips Huaigu (including history) is a poet in the poetry reading books or tour sites, on the historical figures and events is, lead to the situation or their own life experiences, or ancient to explain now, or in ancient satirical work. Because the poems of history, so the appreciation is difficult, for secondary school students do not have a certain appreciation of know-how, answer must be in a dilemma, and do not know from where to start, how to. This paper makes a rough analysis of this, to poke the suspicions, inspired the SDL, open channel solution. In appreciating, we should first understand the difference between ancient poems and historical records and historical theories. First, do not regard the ancient poetry as a history. Because of the limitation of the space, the poets often deal with history with attack on one point, less than the rest, and even do not pay attention to the fact that the one hundred percent are loyal to historical facts. For example, Li Shangyins Jia Sheng, and has a historical discrepancy, in fact, the Han emperor is not stupid, do not want to reuse Jia Yi, Jia Yi was not the main reason is because the reuse was the most against the Minister Zhou bo. The poet is to seize the ask the spirits and the many emperors believed in Buddhism Mei and his Jia Yi and will not be reused these two similarities, to play, to express their live up to the lofty endless Lingyun feeling. Two is not to nostalgia poetry as history, in twenty words to one hundred words of a poem or word, absolutely not for a historic events or figures to make a comprehensive evaluation, make a conclusion, just to express a feeling. For example in the textbooks of historian Jian Bozan Inner Mongolia Wang Zhaojun of Cuba comment nature with obvious history, that policy is better than war and pow