污染环境罪主观罪过探析.pdfVIP

2016 年10 月 湖北警官学院学报 Oct. 2016 第5 期总第176 期 Journal of Hubei University of Police No.5 Ser.No.176 污染环境罪主观罪过探析 王运召 （中南财经政法大学刑事司法学院，湖北武汉430073） 【摘 要】污染环境罪的主观罪过形式一直是困扰司法界和理论界的难题，理论界关于主观罪过形式问题的争论 不断，主要有故意说、过失说和复合罪过说。如果坚持过失说，那么行为人对违反法规是“明知”的，但对危害结果是 过失的，这实质上是双重罪过。复合罪过说不符合我国刑法“同一罪名，同一罪质”的立法原则。因此，在实然层面污 染环境罪的主观罪过应坚持故意说。在应然层面应该将本罪罪过分开分条设置，分别包含故意和过失。另外，适用 严格责任有悖于中国刑法的立法基础，违背了刑法的谦抑性。 【关键词】污染环境罪；主观罪过；故意说；过失说；复合罪过说；严格责任 ( ) 【中图分类号】D914 【文献标识码】A 【文章编号】1673―2391 2016 05―0050―06 Analysis on Subj ective Fault of Crime of Polluting Environment Wang Yunzhao （Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, Wuhan 430073, China） Abstract: The subj ective fault form of crime of polluting environment is a difficult problem in the judicial circle and the theoretical circle. Much dispute has centered on the intention theory, the fault theory and the compound fault theory. The fault theory means double faults in nature because the offender is fully aware of code violation and has a fault on harmful consequence. The compound fault theory is incompatible with the principle of the same accusation and the same charac- teristic in Chinese criminal law. Therefore, the subj ective fault of crime of polluting environment must insist on the inten- tion theory on practical level and should be divided into intention and fault in different provisions on ought-to-be level. The application of strict liability may go against legislative foundation and modesty of Chinese criminal law. Key words: Crime of Polluting Environment; Subj ective Faul