- 1、本文档共13页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
2013研究生入学考试英语一试题Read the following text
2013研究生入学考试英语一试题 Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B, C or D on ANSWER SHEET 1. (10 points)
People are, on the whole, poor at considering background information when making individual decisions. At first glance this might seem like a strength that 1 the ability to make judgments which are unbiased by 2 factors. But Dr. Uri Simonsohn speculated that an inability to consider the big 3 was leading decision-makers to be biased by the daily samles of information they were working with. 4 , he theorised that a judge 5 of apperaring too soft 6 crime might be more likely to send someone to prison 7 he had already sentenced five or six other defendants only to forced community service on that day。
To 8 this idea, he turned to the university-admissions process. In theory, the 9 of an applicant should not depend on the few others 10 randomly for interview during the same day, but Dr. Simonsoho suspected the truth was 11 。
He studied the results of 9,323 MBA interviews 12 by 31 admissions officers. The interviewers had 13 applicants on a scale of one to five. This scale 14 numerous factors into consideration. The scores were 15 used in conjunction with an applicant’s score on the Granduate Managent Adimssion Test, or GMAT, a standardized exam which is 16 out of 800 points, to make a decision on whether to accept him or her。
Dr. Simonsoho found if the score of the previous candidate in a daily series of interviewees was 0.75 points or more higher than that of the one 17 that, then the score for the next applicant would 18 by an average of 0.075 points. This might sound small, but to 19 the effects of such a decrease a candidate could need 30 more GMAT points than would otherwise have been 20 。
1. [A] grants [B]submits [C]transmits [D]delivers
2. [A] minor [B]objective [C]crucial [D] external
3. [A] issue [B]vision [C]picture [D]external
4. [A] For example [B] On average [C]In principle [D]Above all
5. [A] fond
您可能关注的文档
- Java(10专)C卷答案及评分标准.doc
- 法律专业英语词汇汇总-律师部分.doc
- 百年战争解说稿.doc
- 英语 导服题库.doc
- MP-8813B 广播分区器中英文说明书 - 复制.doc
- 嵌套TabHost(TabHost中放TabHost,类似二级目录、二级树).docx
- 销售企业各部门费用分配模板.doc
- 森林英语词汇.doc
- ITSM需求说明书.doc
- 全国英语等级考试二级听力2017年3月试题.doc
- 中国国家标准 GB/T 45390-2025动力锂电池生产设备通信接口要求.pdf
- 中国国家标准 GB/T 45393.2-2025信息技术 建筑信息模型(BIM)软件 第2部分:参数化模型.pdf
- GB/T 45393.2-2025信息技术 建筑信息模型(BIM)软件 第2部分:参数化模型.pdf
- 《GB/T 45393.2-2025信息技术 建筑信息模型(BIM)软件 第2部分:参数化模型》.pdf
- GB/T 10184-2025电站锅炉性能试验规程.pdf
- 海尔智家股份有限公司海外监管公告 - 海尔智家股份有限公司2024年度环境、社会及管治报告.pdf
- 上海复旦张江生物医药股份有限公司2024 环境、社会及管治报告.pdf
- 中国邮政储蓄银行股份有限公司中国邮政储蓄银行2024年可持续发展报告.pdf
- 豫园股份:2024年环境、社会及管治(ESG)报告.pdf
- 南京熊猫电子股份有限公司海外监管公告 - 2024年度环境、社会及治理(ESG)报告.pdf
最近下载
- 骨科无菌术 手术区域的准备.pptx
- 《海岸带生态系统现状调查与评估技术导则 第7部分:牡蛎礁》(报批稿).pdf VIP
- GB4943-2001 信息技术设备 安全 第1部分:通用要求.pdf
- 基于舞弊风险因子理论的柏堡龙财务舞弊案例研究.pdf
- 《海岸带生态系统现状调查与评估技术导则 第5部分:珊瑚礁》(报批稿).pdf VIP
- 建筑施工安全风险辨识和分级管控指南、台账、企业安全风险分级管控清单.docx VIP
- 2025年施工员考试题库及完整答案【名师系列】.docx VIP
- 2025年施工员考试题库附完整答案【夺冠】.docx VIP
- 2025年白蚁防治员岗位职业技能资格知识考试题库(附含答案).docx
- 国际护士节护理操作技能竞赛理论题库.docx
文档评论(0)