- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
桅子论文:中药材栀子的化学物质基础研究
桅子论文:中药材栀子的化学物质基础研究
【中文摘要】本文对中药材栀子的化学物质基础进行研究,并建立了较为完善的质量标准,具体内容如下:建立了栀子药材的三波长高效液相指纹图谱;采用液质联用技术对指纹图谱主要色谱峰定性分析,推测了13个化合物结构及裂解方式;对栀子药材中京尼平龙胆二糖苷、栀子苷、绿原酸、西红花苷Ⅰ、Ⅱ进行含量测定;并将内参校正法应用于栀子药材多成分定量分析,考察不同类化合物相对定量时校正因子的系统适用性,结果显示,分别以栀子苷、西红花苷Ⅰ为参照评价相对定量京尼平龙胆二糖苷和绿原酸时校正因子适用性较差(RSD5%);而相对定量栀子苷、西红花苷Ⅰ、Ⅱ时,校正因子适用性良好(RSD5%),相对定量的结果与实测值无显著差异(RSD5%),对比研究栀子药材不同炮制品以及不同果实部位的指纹图谱和主要成分的含量。与生栀子、炒栀子相比,焦栀子化学成分较少且主要成分含量偏低;栀子籽仁和果皮的化学成分有明显区别。建立了中药材栀子的质量标准,采用薄层色谱法同时鉴别栀子中京尼平龙胆二糖苷、栀子苷、西红花苷Ⅰ3个成分;考察了28批栀子药材的水分、灰分、酸不溶灰分、醇浸出物的含量,计算95%置信区间,按95%置信区间的80%和120%规定下限和上限,则水分、灰分、酸不溶灰分不得高于7.9%、7.6%、0.2%,醇浸出物不得低于9.1%;建立了整体表征栀子药材质量的3波长指纹图谱;多成分定量分析了栀子中京尼平龙胆二糖苷、栀子苷、绿原酸、西红花苷Ⅰ、Ⅱ的含量,按95%置信区间的80%为下限,分别不得低于6.0mg·g-1、30.1mg·g-1、0.8mg·g1-、4.4 mg·g-1、0.7 mg·g-1;
【英文摘要】In this paper, chemical substance of tranditional Chinese medicine of Gardeniae Fructus (GF) was studied, and a comprehensive quality standard was established. Details are as follows:Three-wavelength fingerprint of GF was established. LC-MS technique was applied for qualitative analysis, and thirteen compounds were identified by combing with related literatures; Five components of Genipin-1-gentiobioside, Geniposide, Chlorogenic acid, CrocinⅠand CrocinⅡin GF were determined; Quantitative analysis of multi-components by internal reference (QAMIR) was applied in FG quality evaluation, System suitability of a internal standard to determine different kind compounds was test. Geniposide, crocinⅠcould be the internal reference to determine Geniposide, crocinⅠ,Ⅱ, respectively. System suitability results of correction factor (f) were good (RSD5%) and results of QAMIR and external standard method were of no significant difference (RSD5%).Fingerprint and five main components contents of different processed drugs and different parts of GF were studied comparatively. Result showed that Chao Gardeniae Fructus (CGF) had little difference from GF while Jiao Gardeniae Fructus (JGF) distinguished much. Specifically, JGF had less chemical compositions and their main components contents
文档评论(0)