Book 3-Unit 5-Appendix 2-Understanding the Text-答案.doc

Book 3-Unit 5-Appendix 2-Understanding the Text-答案.doc

  1. 1、本文档共5页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
Book 3-Unit 5-Appendix 2-Understanding the Text-答案

Understanding the Text Unit 5 When Help Hurts Step 1: Focus on Meaning Skimming: Read the passage quickly. Pay special attention to the first several sentences of each paragraph. Then, divide the passage into three parts and complete the following chart. Part I Main Idea Para. 1 to 3 A terrible traffic accident happened and one of the friends was seriously injured. Para. 4 to 9 The two friends were in court for three times. Para. 10 The implication brought by the case. Scanning: Read paragraphs 1 through 3 and answer the following questions orally without referring to the text. What was the relationship between Lisa Torti and Alexandra Van Horn in 2003? They were close pals. What did they do to celebrate Halloween, 2003? They went to a local club to dance and drink beer. When did they leave the club that night? Did they take the same car? They left at 1:30 am. They didn’t take the same car. What happened after they left the club? The lead car knocked a light pole over and Van Horn couldn’t get out. How did Torti try to help Van Horn? What was the result? Torti yanked open the door and pulled Van Horn out. The result was that Van Horn was paralyzed below the middle of her chest. 1.3 Skimming: Read paragraphs 4 through 9 and discuss the following concepts with your partner according to the cue words given below. The Opinion of Van Horn and Her Attorney The Opinion of Torti and Her Attorney Court’s Decision The Trial Court(4-5) A crazy situation Torti was “out of control” Torti shouldn’t have moved Van Horn Torti wasn’t responsible Torti was protected by Good Samaritan statute. 1. Torti wasn’t liable 2. The case should be dismissed. The Appeals Court(6-8) Torti was not supplying urgent medical care she acted negligently. Torti was a brave soul It’s unfair that such a brave soul was not protected by law. Torti’s helping Van Horn was not emergency medical care; The case shouldn’t have been dismissed. The Supreme Court(9) The appeals court

文档评论(0)

xcs88858 + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

版权声明书
用户编号:8130065136000003

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档