网站大量收购独家精品文档,联系QQ:2885784924

国际商法英文案例选编8, E-Commerce Law.ppt

国际商法英文案例选编8, E-Commerce Law.ppt

  1. 1、本文档共72页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
Lawrence FELDMAN v. GOOGLE, INC. Case Study Questions What is a click-warp contract? What types of conduct constitute consent to terms and conditions on a website? Clicking the “I agree” button on a Web page or during the installation of software? Browsing the “Terms and Conditions” on a website, etc.? ProCD, Inc v. Matthew Zeidenberg and Silken Mountain Web Services, Inc. Case Study Questions: What is a shrink-wrap contract? Is it unique to electronic business? Does an average buyer read or understand a shrink-wrap clause? The difficulty with the typical shrink wrap contracts is that the terms are not made available to the purchaser until after payment is made. When is offer and acceptance made in purchasing goods containing a shrink-wrap license? Must the seller prove sufficient evidence of notice and assent to the terms at the time of purchase in order for a shrink-wrap license to be binding? When the purchase precedes the communication of detailed terms, should the terms be binding? ProCD, Inc v. Matthew Zeidenberg and Silken Mountain Web Services, Inc. Questions for Discussion 1 It seems that Click-wrap contract is less controversial than shrink-wrap contract in that the Internet user sees the contract terms on the computer screen and cannot complete the purchase without clicking the button on the screen to indicate assent. And the Lawrence court also upheld the use of click-wrap contracts. Do you agree with this? Why or why not? ProCD, Inc v. Matthew Zeidenberg and Silken Mountain Web Services, Inc. Questions for Discussion 2 A challenge to click-wrap contracts lies in how to assure that the user clearly and expressly manifests assent to the stated terms. To what degree should the action of clicking represent the genuine consent from the purchaser? Should a click-wrap be held as “contract of adhesion”? If yes, to what degree? ProCD, Inc v. Matthew Zeidenberg and Silken Mountain Web Services, Inc. Questions for Discussion 3 Do you agree with the Sp

文档评论(0)

别样风华 + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档