急诊护理的不同路径对急诊患者抢救的效果分析.docVIP

精品论文 参考文献 急诊护理的不同路径对急诊患者抢救的效果分析 孙效红 　　北京市顺义区中医院急诊科 101300 　　【摘 要】目的：对比分析不同急诊护理路径对急诊患者的抢救效果。方法：纳入我院2013年6月至2014年6月200例急诊患者，按时间段进行分组，2013年12月前入院的患者100例作为对照组，患者治疗后进行常规急诊护理，2014年1月至2014年6月入院的患者100例作为实验组，患者治疗后采用临床护理路径进行护理，对比两组患者不同急诊护理路径对患者血压、心率、呼吸、评估时间、急诊时间进行对比，并对治疗前后生活质量进行评分，调查患者的满意度。结果：两组患者不同护理路径治疗后，实验组评估时间（0.74plusmn;0.12）、急诊时间（42.71plusmn;9.12）明显低于对照组，而生活质量评分（2.94plusmn;0.42）明显高于对照组；其统计值分别为（t=8.14，P=0.000）、（t=6.14，P=0.012）、（t=3.5，P=0.032），具有统计学意义；实验组患者满意度（98%）明显高于对照组（82%），Plt;0.01，具有统计学意义。结论：对急诊患者应用临床护理路径具有更有效的效果，具有重要的临床作用和价值。 　　【关键词】急诊护理；临床护理；不同路径 　　【中图分类号】R47 【文献标识码】B 【文章编号】1764-8999（2015）7-0516-01 　　【Abstract】Objective:To analysis the rescue effect of different emergency nursing path in emergency patients through comparative reserach. Methods:200 patients in cases of emergency in our hospital from 2013 June to 2014 in June were randomly divided them into two groups,control group and experiment group according to the admission time. 100 cases in hospital before Dec,2013 were divided into control group,which were treated in traditional way;while another 100 cases from Jan,2013 to Jun,2014 were divided into experimental group,which were treated in special clinical ways. Through the comparison of blood pressure, heart rate, respiration, evaluation time, emergency time before and after the treatment were compared and anylsised;moreover the quality of life score, revealed the patientsrsquo; satisfaction survey were compared. Results Through comparison, the time evaluation time and treatment time used by the experimental group with repectively(0.74 plusmn; 0.12)hours and (42.71 plusmn; 9.12) hours were both shorter than which spented in control group;with significant difference,P lt;0.05 with statistical significance. In other hand, the quality of life score for experimental group with (2.94 plusmn; 0.42)scores were much higher than that for control group,with significant difference,Plt;0.05,with statistical sighnificance,the statistical values were respectiv