- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
改良小Leep刀在绝经后妇女宫颈活检中应用的可行性分析
精品论文 参考文献
改良小Leep刀在绝经后妇女宫颈活检中应用的可行性分析
(江苏常州武进中医医院 江苏 常州 213000)
【摘 要】目的:探讨改良小Leep刀在绝经后妇女宫颈活检中应用的可行性。方法:选取2012年2月-2015年3月我院收治的118例进行宫颈活检的绝经妇女,随机平均分为观察组和对照组,对照组采取传统的宫颈活检钳进行宫颈活检,观察组采取改良小Leep刀进行宫颈活检,观察比较两组患者的临床治疗效果、术中出血量、手术时间、术后出血量以及术后并发症情况。结果:观察组患者的治疗有效率、CIN病理活检、粘膜慢性炎治愈率以及挖空细胞检出情况显著高于对照组患者,差异具有统计学意义(Plt;0.05);观察组患者的术中、术后出血量、术后并发率均显著低于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(Plt;0.05);两组患者的手术时间差异不显著,不具有统计学意义(Pgt;0.05);观察组患者治疗后均优于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(Plt;0.05)。结论:改良小 Leep 刀对绝经妇女的宫颈活检效果显著,较传统的宫颈活检钳方法好,有利于患者身体的复原,值得在绝经妇女的宫颈检查中广泛使用。
【关键词】绝经妇女;宫颈活检;改良小Leep刀;宫颈活检钳
【中图分类号】R737.33 【文献标识码】A 【文章编号】1004-6194(2015)02-0129-02
【Abstract】Objective:To investigate the feasibility of modified small Leep knife in the cervical biopsy of postmenopausal women. Methods:in February 2012 - 2015 years 3 months in our hospital from 118 cases of cervical biopsy of post menopausal women were randomly divided into observation group and control group on average, while the control group adopted the traditional cervical biopsy forceps biopsy of the cervix, the observation group adopted modified loop electrosurgical excision procedure of cervical biopsy. After operation, patients in the two groups were compared the clinical effect of the treatment of bleeding volume, operation time, bleeding volume and postoperative complications were observed. Results:in the observation groups of patients with treatment efficiency, CIN biopsy, mucosa chronic inflammation cure rate as well as the hollowed cell detection was significantly higher than that of the control group, the difference has statistical significance (P lt; 0.05); observation group of patients with intraoperative, postoperative bleeding, postoperative complication rate were significantly lower than that of the control group, the difference has statistical significance (P lt; 0.05); the operation time difference between the two groups was not significant, does not have statistical significance (P gt; 0.05); patients in observation group were better than that of the c
文档评论(0)