- 1、本文档共5页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 5、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 6、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 7、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
浅析抗生素治疗急性肺脓肿的疗效以及对生活质量的影响
精品论文 参考文献
浅析抗生素治疗急性肺脓肿的疗效以及对生活质量的影响
大庆市肇州县肇州镇卫生院 166400
摘要:目的 研究并探讨抗生素治疗急性肺脓肿的临床效果。方法 此次研究的对象是选择72例急性肺脓肿患者,将其临床资料进行回顾性分析,并采用随机数字表法分为对照组和试验组,各36例。对照组采用清热解毒法进行治疗,试验组采用抗生素进行治疗。8周后,对两组的临床效果和安全性进行分析,并通过问卷调查的形式,让试验组患者对治疗前后的生活质量进行评分。结果 试验组患者出现恶心、食欲缺乏、头晕乏力的不良反应发生率依次为5.6%、5.6%、2.8%,对照组依次为11.1%、13.9%、8.3%,试验组不良反应发生情况显著低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(Plt;0.05);治疗前试验组患者对呼吸状况、饮食状况、工作状态的满意程度依次为58.3%、69.4%、61.1%,治疗后满意程度依次为88.9%、94.4%、91.7%,比较差异有统计学意义(Plt;0.05)。试验组治疗总有效率为97.2%,对照组为77.8%,试验组总有效率显著高于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(Plt;0.05)。结论 采用抗生素治疗急性肺脓肿疗效明显优于清热解毒法,且不良反应的发生率更低,还可以有效提高患者的生活质量,值得临床推广应用。
关键词:急性肺脓肿;抗生素;清热解毒法
[Abstract]Objective To study the clinical effect of antibiotics in the treatment of acute lung abscess.Methods 72 cases of acute lung abscess were selected,the clinical data were retrospectively analyzed,and were randomly divided into control group and experimental group,36 cases in each group.The control group was treated with the method of clearing away heat and toxin,and the experimental group was treated with antibiotics.After 8 weeks,the clinical effect and safety of the two groups were analyzed,and the quality of life of patients before and after treatment was evaluated by questionnaire.The results of the experimental group patients with adverse reaction of nausea,lack of appetite,dizziness and fatigue rate were 5.6%,5.6%,2.8%,the control group were 11.1%,13.9%,8.3%,the experimental group the incidence of adverse reactions was significantly lower than the control group,the difference was statistically significant(Plt;0.05);the experimental group before treatment of patients satisfaction with working condition respiratory status and dietary status,were 58.3%,69.4%,61.1%,treatment satisfaction were 88.9%,94.4%,91.7%,the difference was statistically significant(Plt;0.05).The total effective rate of the experimental group was 97.2%,the control group was 77.8%,the total effective rate of the experimental group was significantly higher than that of the control group,the difference was statis
文档评论(0)