复方石淋通辅助钬激光治疗输尿管结石疗效观察[Word文档].docVIP

复方石淋通辅助钬激光治疗输尿管结石疗效观察[Word文档].doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
复方石淋通辅助钬激光治疗输尿管结石疗效观察[Word文档]

复方石淋通辅助钬激光治疗输尿管结石疗效观察 关键字: 复方石淋通辅助钬激光治疗输尿管结石疗效观察 本文为Word文档,感谢你的关注!   [摘要] 目的 探?复方石淋通辅助钬激光治疗输尿管结石的效果。 方法 选取2015年6月~2016年5月期间在我院确诊并择期行钬激光治疗的输尿管结石患者200例,随机分为两组,复方石淋通胶囊辅助钬激光治疗为观察组,单纯钬激光治疗为对照组,其中5例手术过程中改为开放式手术,为脱落病例。观察比较两组结石排净率、住院时间、术后感染、肾绞痛和不良反应发生率,并检测患者术前、术后第7天血肌酐和尿素氮水平。 结果 观察组术后3 d和术后2周结石排净率为57.1%、94.9%,显著高于对照组的35.1%、84.5%,两个时段两组结石排净率差异均具有统计学意义(P0.05);观察组术后平均住院时间为(2.9±0.4)d,显著低于对照组的(3.8±0.5)d,两组差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。术后第7天观察组患者SCr、BUN平均水平显著优于对照组和手术前,差异均具有统计学意义(P0.05);观察组出现术后感染、肾绞痛并发症的发生率仅1.0%、2.0%,显著低于对照组8.2%、12.4%,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05),且两组均无明显不良反应发生。 结论 复方石淋通胶囊辅助钬激光治疗输尿管结石患者能加速结石排出,减少术后感染和肾绞痛,帮助肾功能恢复,临床应用安全有效。   [关键词] 复方石淋通胶囊;钬激光;输尿管结石;排净率;肾功能   [] R693.4 [] B [] 1673-9701(2016)36-0063-04   [Abstract] Objective To explore the effect of compound Shi-Lin-Tong combined with holmium laser in the treatment of ureteral calculi. Methods A total of 200 patients with ureteral calculi who were diagnosed and treated with elective holmium laser in our hospital from June 2015 to May 2016 were enrolled and randomly divided into two groups: the observation group with the treatment of compound Shi-Lin-Tong combined with holmium laser and the control group given holmium laser, of which 5 cases changed to open surgery as special cases. The incidence of stone removal, hospitalization, postoperative infection, renal colic and adverse reactions rate were observed and compared. And the serum creatinine and urea nitrogen levels were measured before and on day 7 after operation. Results The removal rates of stone were 57.1% and 94.9% on day 3 and in the second week after operation, which were significantly higher than those of the control group(35.1% and 84.5%). The difference of stone removal rate between the two groups was statistically significant significance in the two periods(P0.05). The average length of hospital stay was(2.9±0.4) days in the observation group, which was significantly lower than that in the control group(3.8±0.5)days, and the difference between the two gr

文档评论(0)

rovend + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档