- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
管状胃代食管术与全胃代食管术治疗食管癌的疗效对比分析
精品论文 参考文献
管状胃代食管术与全胃代食管术治疗食管癌的疗效对比分析
四川省乐山市人民医院心胸外科 614000
【中图分类号】 R735 【文献标识码】 A 【文章编号】 1550-1868(2016)6
【摘要】目的:观察分析管状胃代食管术与全胃代食管术治疗食管癌的临床效果。方法:选取2013年1月~2015年12月收治的76例食管癌患者,通过随机数字表法分为观察组(n=38)和对照组(n=38),对照组患者采用全胃代食管术治疗,观察组患者采用管状胃代食管术治疗,观察两组患者治疗效果。结果:两组患者术中出血量、手术时间、减压时间、引流时间、住院时间等指标比较差异不具有统计学意义(Pgt;0.05),术后观察组患者反流性食管炎、胸胃综合征发生率较对照组显著降低(Plt;0.05),吻合口瘘、吻合口狭窄发生率无明显差异(Pgt;0.05)。结论:针对食管癌患者,管状胃代食管术治疗效果优于全胃代食管术,可减少术后并发症,安全可靠,保障手术治疗效果,值得临床推广应用。
【关键词】食管癌;管状胃代食管术;全胃代食管术;临床效果
Comparative analysis of clinical effect of tubular gastric esophagus and whole stomach esophagus in treatment of esophageal cancer
[Abstract] Objective: To observe and analyze the clinical effects of tubular gastric esophagus and whole stomach esophagus in treatment of esophageal cancer. Methods: 76 patients with esophageal cancer and who accepted treatments from January,2013 to December,2015 were selected,and were divided into observation group (n=38) and the control group (n=38) by the random number table method.In the control group of patients were treated with whole stomach esophagus while in the observation group of patients were treated with tubular gastric esophagus.Then,the treatment effects of two groups of patients were observed.Results: The amount of bleeding during the operation, operation time, decompression time, drainage time and hospitalization time of two groups of patients were not statistically significant (Pgt;0.05).After operation, the reflux esophagitis, incidence of thoracic stomach syndrome in the observation group were significantly lower than that of the control group (Plt;0.05), and there was no significant difference in the incidence of anastomotic leakage and anastomotic stenosis (Pgt;0.05). Conclusion: In the treatment of esophageal cancer patients, the effect of tubular stomach esophagus replacement is better than that of the whole stomach,which can reduce the complications after the operation,and it is safety and reliable, and ensure the effect of surgi
文档评论(0)