交直流漏磁钢轨裂纹检测对比研究.pdfVIP

Instrumentation and Equipments 仪器与设备, 2017, 5(4), 106-116 Published Online December 2017 in Hans. /journal/iae /10.12677/iae.2017.54015 Research on Comparison of DC MFL and AC MFL Detection for Track Surface Cracks 1* 2 3 Song Ding , Dong Li , Dingyi Zhu 1 School of Electrical Engineering and Control Science, Nanjing TECH University, Nanjing Jiangsu 2 School of Automation, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing Jiangsu 3 School of Mechanical Engineering, Nanjing TECH University, Nanjing Jiangsu th nd th Received: Dec. 9 , 2017; accepted : Dec. 22 , 2017; published: Dec. 29 , 2017 Abstract The surface cracks are the main defects of rail track. Based on the characteristic and electromag- netic theories, the DC magnetic flux leakage (MFL) and AC MFL are studied. And the measurement system is built up. Experiments are applied to study the MFL signals of DC MFL and AC MFL tech- nology with hand-move, low-speed and high-speed motor drive. The defects detection solutions are calculated to compare DC MFL and AC MFL accurately. The experiment results propose that these two technologies can detect the surface cracks with hand-move and low-speed (<2 m/s) motor drive. AC MFL has higher solutions, more stable signals and better results than those of DC MFL. When the rotation speed is more than 2 m/s, DC MFL is more accurate. Combining each other these two technologies can detect the rail track in different measurement conditions. Keywords DC Magnetic Flux Leakage, AC Magnetic Flux Leakage, Track Crack, High Speed Inspection 交直流漏磁钢轨裂纹检测对比研究 1* 2 3