智慧财产权专利.PPT

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
智慧财产权专利

* Roots of international law can be traced to the 17th century Peace of Westfalia. Early laws were concerned with war and peace and political issues. As trade increased, issues of commercial affairs grew in importance. If a nation refuses to accept a decision against it made by the World Court, it can appeal to the Security Council of the U.N. * Code Napoleon of 1804 was the prototype for the code law system that predominates in Europe today. The U.S. legal system is based on English civil law. * Asian countries are split. India, Pakistan, Malaysia, Singapore, and Hong Kong are common-law countries. Japan, Korea, Thailand, Indochina, Taiwan, Indonesia, and China are civil-law jurisdictions. Scandinavian countries use parts of both systems. The majority of countries today have civil-law systems. Many countries that were colonized up Europeans continue the legal systems imposed upon them. i.e., Singapore and Hong Kong were British colonies and have a common law system. Former French colonies, like Niger and Guyana have civil law systems. In post-communist Eastern and Central Europe, consultants from both civil and common law countries are trying to influence the process. Central Europe relies on the German civil law system while Russia looks to the U.S. system. Germans think that U.S. law is too complicated and the U.S. response is that the German system is outdated. * Any Westerner doing business in Malaysia and in the Middle East should have, at minimum, a rudimentary understanding of Islamic law and its implications for commercial activities. Brewers, for example, must refrain from advertising beer on billboards or in local-language newspapers. * Revlon sued a British company, UOL, for breach of contract in a federal court in New York. UOL claimed the court lacked jurisdiction. Revlon cited the presence of UOL’s name on an office building in the city in which the company had 50% ownership. The judge ruled against the motion to dismiss. * European patents are

文档评论(0)

xiaozu + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档