- 1、本文档共4页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 5、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 6、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 7、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
医学论文-瘢痕子宫中孕引产方法探讨
医学论文-瘢痕子宫中孕引产方法探讨
【摘要】? 目的 探讨适用于瘢痕子宫患者安全有效的中孕引产方法。方法 瘢痕子宫中孕引产患者65例分三组:第一组20例,依沙吖啶羊膜腔注射引产;第二组22例,米非司酮联合米索前列醇引产;第三组23例,米非司酮联合依沙吖啶引产。比较三种方法的临床效果和不良反应。结果 第二组与第一组相比:排胎时间短,引产成功率高,胎盘胎膜残留率低,无宫颈裂伤,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。第三组与第一组相比:宫缩发动时间提前,排胎时间短,引产成功率高,胎盘胎膜残留率低,无宫颈裂伤,差异有统计学意义(P0.05);与第二组相比:宫缩发动时间提前(P0.05),余项相比无统计学意义(P0.05)。结论 第二、三种引产方法优于第一种,此两种方法用于瘢痕子宫中孕引产安全有效,值得临床推广应用。第三种方法更优于第二种。
【关键词】? 瘢痕子宫;中孕引产;依沙吖啶;米非司酮;米索前列醇
??? [Abstract]? Objective? To investigate the safe effective methods for induced abortion of midtrimester pregnancy patients with a history of cesarean section.Methods? 65 cases were divided into three groups at random.Group 1∶20 cases,Ethacridine was used for the induced abortion by intra-amniotic instillation. Group 2∶22 cases,Mifepristone and Misoprostol were used for the induced abortion .Group 3∶23 cases,Mifepristone was used for initiating midtrimester abortion with Ethacridine intra-amniotic instillation.The clinical efficiency and side effects of three groups were compared. Results? Group 2 compared? with group 1:time of the induced abortion was shortened,success rate of the induced abortion was high,incomplete abortion rate was low,no cervical rupture. The difference had statistic significance(P0.05).Group 3 compared with group 1:time of the initiation of the uterus contractions and time of the induced abortion were shortened,success rate of the induced abortion was high,incomplete abortion rate was low,no cervical rupture. The difference had statistic significance(P0.05).Group 3 compared with group 2:time of the initiation of the uterus contractions was shortened(P0.05),there was no statistic significance in else(P0.05). Conclusion? The second and third methods are better than the first,these two methods are safe and effective for the scar uterus with induced abortion.They are worth applying clinically. The third method is still better than the second.
??? [Key words]? scar uterus; induced abortion of midtrimester pregnancy; Ethacridine; Mifepristone; Misoprost
文档评论(0)