基于生命周期评价的小型乘用车动力能耗对比.docVIP

基于生命周期评价的小型乘用车动力能 耗对比 刘鲲鹏李方一宋卓马大卫 安徽省电力公司电力科学研宄院 选取中国市场上纯电动、油电混合、燃油和天然气动力四种类型的小型乘用车典 型车型，从全牛.命周期视角对比能源效率与环境影响的差异。从一次能源消耗看, 四种动力乘用车单位公里动力能耗均值分别为1. 741V1J、2. 19MJ、2. 28MJ、2. 94MJ。 即在行驶同样的里程下，纯电动、混合动力车比传统燃油车平均一次能源分别节 省19. 7%、4.4%。从动力能耗生命周期的环境影响看，燃汕汽车的酸化潜值和全 球变暖潸值都高于其他动力车型，而纯电动和混合动力汽车的推广有助于降低 汽车行驶过程中S02、NOX、CO等污染物的排放。敏感性分析结果显示，煤电占比、 供电煤耗的降低与火电机组脱硫脱硝除尘率的提升都有助于纯电动和混合动力 乘用车减排。 关键词： 电动汽车;牛命周期评价;动力能耗;大气污染物; 刘鲲鹏（1978-）,男，安徽省合肥人，，高级工程师，主要研 究方向为继电保护及其自动远动技术。 李方一（1985-）,男，湖南省常德人，，副教授，主要研允方 向为可持续发展战略与管理。 2017-11-09 基金：国网安徽省电力公司科技项目（编号:SGAHOOOOFJJS1600572） Comparative Study of Power Sources of Small Passenger Cars Based on Life Cycle Assessment LIU Kun-peng LI Fang-yi SONG Zhuo MA Da-wei XI Zhen-qian State Grid Anhui Electric Power Company; School of Management, Hefei University of Technology; State Grid Anhui Electric Power Research Institute; Abstract： Typical models of pure electric vehicle, hybrid vehicle, fuel vehicle and natural gas vehicle in China were selected, and the energy consumption and environmental impacts were quantified and compared by life cycle assessment method. The average primary energy consumption of pure electric vehicles, hybrid vehicles, fuel vehicles and natural gas vehicles per kilometer were 1. 74 MJ, 2. 19 MJ, 2. 28 MJ, 2. 94 MJ respectively, which meant pure electric vehicles and hybrid vehicles could save primary energy by 19. 7% and 4. 4% compared with fuel vehicles for the same distance. From the perspective of life cycle environmental impact, acidification potential and global warming potential of fuel vehicles were higher than other vehicles, and the promotion of pure electric vehicles and hybrid vehicles could reduce emissions in S02, N0x, CO and other pollutants. According to the sensitivity analysis, reduction of proportion of coal power, coal consumption for electricity generation, increase of the rates of desulfurization and denigration could contribute to emissions reduction of pure electric vehicles and hybrid vehicles. Keyword： electric