does liking explain variance above and beyond lmx a meta-analysis：（并喜欢解释方差超出lmx荟萃分析）.pdfVIP

Human Resource Management Review 27 (2017) 149–166 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Human Resource Management Review journal homepage: www. elsevier. com/ locate/humres Does liking explain variance above and beyond LMX? A meta-analysis James H. Dulebohn ⁎, Dongyuan Wu, Chenwei Liao School of Human Resources and Labor Relations, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, United States a b s t r a c t Although liking or affect was a central construct during the 1980s and 1990s in supervisor- subordinate dyadic research, a review of the literature suggests that since the turn of the century leader-member exchange (LMX) has emerged as the primary construct to assess relational quality. A question exists whether liking, as a reflection of interpersonal attraction, should continue to be included in organization research that focuses on dyadic relations and whether liking is redundant to LMX. To answer this question, we examined the incremental validity and construct redundancy of liking in relation to LMX based on meta-analyses. Results indicated that liking and LMX have sim- ilar patterns with common correlates with respect to effect sizes and significance. Moderator analysis revealed that reporting source of liking and LMX result in significantl