Modulation of Synaptic Transmission in the NTS在NTS突触传递的调控.pptVIP

/#author /integrity The COPE Report 2003 /quiz/quiz.cgi?quiz_id=MqvgAzd3vo /projects/rcr/rcr_authorship/case/index.html CASE /quiz/quiz.cgi?quiz_id=MqvgAzd3vo /projects/rcr/rcr_authorship/case/index.html This case is adapted, with permission, from: When in Rome: Conventions in Assignment of AuthorshipResearch Ethics: Cases and CommentariesVolume 2, Section 1, Authorship.Brian Schrag, ed. Association for Practical and Professional EthicsBloomington, Indiana, February, 1998 * * The Ethics of Authorship….. it’s more delicate than it looks. Objectives Recognize the importance of the responsible authorship. Identify criteria for authorship (Make a K-PACT): ? who should be ? who shouldn’t be ?“the gray areas.” Identify strategies to deal with controversies or conflicts that might arise in authorship. Identify steps in resolving authorship controversies. Talk about “who’s on first” Authorship…. …It is more delicate than it looks. One of the leading causes of academic disputes. Stalls careers Can cause a future academic scientist to leave academics or give up research Ends fruitful collaborations – which could have made major contributions to the field. Mental and emotional stress Triggers the “unthinkable in academics.” and…all the above is 100% preventable Criteria for Authorship International Committee of Medical Journal Editors 2006 Substantial, direct contribution to: ? conception and design or ? acquisition of data or ? data analysis, interpretation Who should be Gray area Who shouldn’t be “Gift authors..” reciprocity. “Honorary authors..” out of historic respect or “fear” $$$ or lab space with no input Data collector (with no input) General supervisor Technical contribution What if they developed the model? 1st paper? 2nd paper? 1000th paper? What if they developed an index or biomarker for cancer, and you want to use it for Type II diabetes? ? 2. Drafting or critically revising article for important