Barriers to Independence Among TANF Recipients Comparing 到TANF受助人之间的独立性比较.pptVIP

下载本文档

0
0
约5.9千字
约 20页
2018-04-17 发布于江西
举报
版权申诉

Barriers to Independence Among TANF Recipients Comparing 到TANF受助人之间的独立性比较.ppt

1、本文档共20页，可阅读全部内容。
2、原创力文档（book118）网站文档一经付费（服务费），不意味着购买了该文档的版权，仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用，不得用于商业用途，未经授权，严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等，侵权必究。
3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传，本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺！文档内容仅供研究参考，付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费，意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险，本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务；查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档，您可以点击这里二次下载。
4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等，请点击“版权申诉”（推荐），也可以打举报电话：400-050-0827(电话支持时间：9:00-18:30)。
5、该文档为VIP文档，如果想要下载，成为VIP会员后，下载免费。
6、成为VIP后，下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后，不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
7、成为VIP后，您将拥有八大权益，权益包括：VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传，每下载1次，网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等，对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档

Barriers to Independence Among TANF Recipients Comparing 到TANF受助人之间的独立性比较.ppt

Barriers to IndependenceAmong TANF Recipients:Comparing Caseworker Records Client Surveys Correne Saunders Pamela C. Ovwigho Catherine E. Born Background Shift from check management to case management Mandatory assessment of employment skills for new TANF recipients (PRWORA, 1996) Barrier identification as a means to improve employment placements and stability Key issue is determining which barriers to measure, and how Research Questions To what extent do clients’ reports of barriers in a research survey correspond with caseworkers’ documentation in their welfare case records? Is there a relationship between caseworker documentation of reported barriers and client characteristics? Methods: Sample Random sample of single adults with children who received a TANF grant in Maryland in June 2002 (n=1,146). For this study, we include only those who responded to a telephone survey between August and October 2002 (n=819, 71.5% response rate). Weighted to represent true proportions of Baltimore City and non-Baltimore City cases in the June 2002 caseload. Methods: Data Sources The TANF Caseload Survey, sponsored by ASPE Included questions re: the prevalence and degree of various barriers over the previous year Conducted through CATI by Mathematica Policy Research, Inc. (MPR) The Client Automated Resource and Eligibility System (CARES), maintained by Maryland DHR Program participation data Electronic Case Narratives Methods: Data Coding Case Narratives examined for personal/family and logistical/situational challenges which were recorded between July 2001 and December 2002. Three coders, with a quality control set of 24.4% and an overall average agreement rate of 98%. Example of a child mental health barrier: “Client returned verification that she is needed in the home to care for her child who was diagnosed with bipolar disorder. Mother is needed in the home to supervise and work with mental health providers to stabilize her child’s mood and behavior.” Results: Summary