- 1、本文档共15页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 5、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 6、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 7、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
Applying the Inspection Process - California State University 加利福尼亚州立大学的应用检验过程.ppt
Applying the Inspection Process What Software Artifacts Are Candidates for Inspection? Software Requirements Software Designs Code Test Plans Requirements InspectionObjectives Is each requirement in the SRS consistent with and traceable to the document that preceded it (if any)? Is the SRS complete? Is each requirement in the SRS clear, concise, internally consistent, unambiguous, and testable? Are we building the right product? Requirements InspectionPrerequisites All inspection team members received inspection process training. The document, if any, that preceded the SRS has been reviewed and approved. The SRS has been internally reviewed. A Requirements Inspection Checklist is available. Requirements Inspection Checklist Do the requirements exhibit a clear distinction between functions and data? Do the requirements define all the information that is to be displayed to the user? Do the requirements address system and user response to error conditions? Is each requirement stated clearly, concisely, and unambiguously? Requirements Inspection Checklist (Cont’d) Is each requirement testable? Are there ambiguous or implied requirements? Are there conflicting requirements? Are there areas not addressed in the SRS that need to be? Are performance requirements stated? Requirements Inspection Checklist (Cont’d) If the requirements involve complex decision chains, are they expressed in a form that facilitates comprehension? Are requirements for performing software upgrades given? Are there requirements that unnecessary level of design detail? Are the real time constraints specified in sufficient detail? Requirements Inspection Checklist (Cont’d) Are the precision and accuracy of calculations specified Is it possible to develop a thorough set of tests based on the information contained in the SRS? If not, what information is missing? Are assumptions and dependencies clearly stated? Does the document contain all information called out in the SRS outline? Design Inspect
您可能关注的文档
- Alcohol Ethanol Booze:醇的酒.ppt
- Constructed Response Items MEQ & SAQ - IDEAL Consortium 建构反应题meq与SAQ理想财团.ppt
- Linear Equations in Two Variables - Northwest-Shoals 在两个变量的线性方程组的西北浅滩.ppt
- 第3章 控制图形显示【质量精品】.ppt
- 成本管理培训教材[企业成本管理].ppt
- 7-Intrototitrations:70 0titrations 20intro 20.ppt
- 奇正藏药绩效考核指标体系.ppt
- 物联网导论-1-物联网技术概论_图文.ppt
- Learn – Serve – Achieve Service-Learning As a Tool for Dropout 学习–服务–实现服务学习作为一种工具,辍学.ppt
- 市场营销-广告【企业营销策划经典】.ppt
文档评论(0)