- 1、本文档共13页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 5、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 6、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 7、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
Exploring Learning Styles - mscpd - home探索学习风格mscpd回家.ppt
Exploring Learning Styles Models, Measurement Applications K.Rowley@mmu.ac.uk Manchester Metropolitan University Aims To explore the current use of learning styles To describe, comment upon and discuss a recent review of learning styles by Coffield et al (2004) To explore the appropriateness and potential use of one of the stronger models/measures to emerge from the above report Learning and Skills Development Agency (LSDA) Commissioned Reports: Coffield, F., Moseley, D., Hall, E. Ecclestone, K. (2004) Should we be using learning styles? What research has to say to practice. .uk/files/pdf/1540.pdf Summarises a systematic review of learning styles models. Discusses the appeal of learning styles. Gives educational and political context to learning styles in post-16 provision. Learning styles and pedagogy in post-16 learning: A systematic and critical review .uk/files/pdf/1543.pdf Models and Measures Reviewed by the Reports The above review(s) identified 71 models of learning styles and 13 of these were categorised as major models Identified a ‘families of learning style’ continuum, ranging from the more ‘fixed’ conceptualisations to those that suggest the possibility for change The ‘open to change’ family moves away from learning styles and towards learning approaches, strategies, orientations and conceptions of learning The Appeal of learning StylesFrom Coffield et al (2004) A simple solution to complex problems A plausible explanation for the ‘failure’ of traditional teaching methods A framework to explore the complexity of learning and teaching An emphasis on appropriateness of teaching style rather than ‘poor learners’ Convenient to some since the emphasis is moved from management to individual styles of teachers and learners The Objections to learning stylesFrom Coffield et al (2004) Lack of Meaningful measurement: Subjective-self report Credibility of some items Lack of context for many items Commercialisation of some prominent t
文档评论(0)