Risk Appetite Framework Challenges - GARP - Global :风险偏好框架GARP全球挑战.pdf

Risk Appetite Framework Challenges - GARP - Global :风险偏好框架GARP全球挑战.pdf

  1. 1、本文档共16页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
Risk Appetite Framework Challenges - GARP - Global :风险偏好框架GARP全球挑战

Risk Appetite Framework Challenges Tsuyoshi Oyama Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Global Association of Risk Professionals December 2013 This paper does not include the official view of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu LLC but only reflects the lecturer’s own opinion. What is risk appetite? Risk appetite “Level and type of risk a firm is able and willing to assume in its exposures and business activities, given its business objectives and obligations to stakeholders” Senior Supervisors Group, “Observation on Development in Risk Appetite Frameworks and IT infrastructure, 2010 ⇒ Risks that the firm, or the management, decides to take in order to meet business objectives ⇒ Significant difference from the conventional risk management is that “the management” is the subject and “to meet business objectives” is the object Risk capacity “The maximum level of risk the firm can assume before it breaches regulatory constraints (e.g., capital, liquidity) or other stakeholders’ constraints (e.g., dividend pay-out)” Financial Stability Board, “Thematic Review on Risk Governance – Peer Review Report” 2013 Approved risk appetite, risk limit “Risk level that when actually breached will require immediate remedial action” Financial Stability Board, “Thematic Review on Risk Governance – Peer Review Report” 2013 2 | © 2012 Global Association of Risk Professionals. All rights reserved. Pulling factors of risk appetite Risk limits that major stakeholders expect financial institutions to keep ⇒ risk capacity From a viewpoint of... • Regulators ─ Stability of financial system, mitigation of moral hazard • Rating agencies ─ Preventing abuse of asymmetric information regarding creditworthiness • Bond holders ─ Concerns over risk transfer from stakeholders • Public ─ Concerns over risk of damaging social justice • Stakeholders ─ Conc

文档评论(0)

aena45 + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档