纺织服装外文翻译文献.doc

外文文献翻译 (含：英文原文及中文译文) 文献出处： Kar F, Fan J, Yu W. Comparison of different test methods for the measurement of fabric or garment moisture transfer properties[J]. Measurement Science & Technology, 2007, 18(7):2033. 英文原文 Comparison of different test methods for the measurement of fabric or garment moisture transfer properties F Kar, J Fan and W Yu Abstract Several test methods exist for determining the water vapour permeability or resistance of textile fabrics or garments. The differences and interrelationships between these methods are not always clear, which presents a problem in comparing results from different test methods. This study is aimed at investigating the relationships between the test results from four typical test methods, including the moisture transmission test (Model CS-141), ASTM E96 cup method, sweating guarded hot plate method (ISO11092) and the sweating fabric manikin (Walter). For the range of air permeable knitted fabrics tested, it was found that good interrelationships exist between the results from the four types of test methods, although some discrepancies exist between different tests due to differences in testing conditions. Test results from different moisture transfer test methods can therefore be convertible with due consideration. Keywords: fabric, water vapour transmission rate, clothing comfort, water vapour resistance 1. Introduction Moisture transfer properties of textile fabrics and garments are important to the thermal comfort of clothed persons. A number of test methods have been developed to evaluate the moisture transfer properties of textile fabrics and garments. However, since the techniques and testing conditions of these tests are very different, results from these tests are not directly comparable. It is therefore necessary to investigate the differences and interrelationships between the results from these different test methods. Dolhan compared two Canadian Standards (CAN2-4.2-M77 and CAN/CGSB-4.2 No. 49-M91) and the ASTM