休克补液辩论晶体液首选.ppt

  1. 1、本文档共34页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
休克补液辩论晶体液首选.ppt

晶体液 VS 胶体液;1,液体种类的选择 2,复苏策略(量) 3,复苏程度endpoints (度) ;晶体液;Design: Systematic review of randomised controlled trials comparing administration of albumin or plasma protein fraction with no administration or with administration of crystalloid solution in critically ill patients with hypovolaemia, burns, or hypoalbuminaemia. Subjects: 30 randomised controlled trials including1419 randomised patients. ;Sesults: Pooled difference in the risk of death with albumin was 6% (95% confidence interval 3% to 9%) with a fixed effects model. These data suggest that for every 17 critically ill patients treated with albumin there is one additional death. Conclusions: There is no evidence that albumin administration reduces mortality in critically ill patients with hypovolaemia, burns, or hypoalbuminaemia and a strong suggestion that it may increase mortality. Conclusion: Albumin increase the risk of mortality by 6%;Design: Systematic review of randomised controlled trials of resuscitation with colloids compared with crystalloids for volume replacement of critically ill patients. Subjects: 37 randomised controlled trials Type of injury: Trauma, Burns, Surgery, Septic and hypovolaemic shock, ARDS, Vascular leak syndrome;1998-2004 Comments in BMJ;SAFE研究: 4% Albumin vs Normal Saline (Saline versus Albumin Fluid Evaluation) 双盲随机对照,28天死亡率评估 澳大利亚新西兰16个ICU,共6997个病人;N Engl J Med 2004;350(22):2247-2256;不同病人群体亚组分析; Albumin NS RR ( 95% CI ) p;;;VISEP Study (HES vs Ringer’s lactate) ;VISEP Study (HES vs Ringer’s lactate) ;VISEP Study (HES vs Ringer’s lactate) ;VISEP Study (HES vs Ringer’s lactate) ;;;VISEP Study (HES vs Ringer’s lactate) ;;;VISEP Study (HES vs Ringer’s lactate) ;;;;胶体液应用的副作用有不少报道,不同的胶体液副作用不一,白蛋白相对好些(Vincent JL. Relevance of albumin in modern critical care medicine. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2009; 23:183–191,这篇文章强调白蛋白不应该用于容量复苏) 右旋糖苷(Dextrans)副作用:肾损害、影响凝血功能、过敏反应 明胶(Gelatin):对肾功能和凝血功能影响相对小,但是过敏反应发生率在合成胶体液中是最高的,同时由于肾滤过快半衰期短,容量复苏效

文档评论(0)

danli208 + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档