dtn网络中基于效用路由方案分析word格式论文.docx

mechanism is by a mixture of Epidemic routing and utility- based routing mechanism. where the utility is a probability value, which be calculated based on historical information meet . but this protocal control the number of the bundle in the network does not have the convergence. As long as meet the P value of encounter bigger than itself, the node would deliver message to encounter. The mechanism is essentially a controlled flooding, and control the granularity is coarse. There is also a message can not deliver , for example, if the source end node to the destination node is the probability of 0.9, it may not exist a relay node, which the probability is glarger than 0.9, in this case, the mechanism degradation to deliver directly, or even impossible to deliver.In this paper, we first analyze and summarize the concepts of DTN, its architecture, and a variety of common routing algorithms, then, in response to these problems, we propose the following programs :A hybrid forwarding strategy, redundancy and utility based mixed alterable utility- based DTN routing mechanism. It has two parameters, one is the number of the message has been delivered. And the oter is P value between encounter node and destination. With two parameters to decide how to forward. It has the following characteristics: it overcome the single-copy has low deliver rate; it overcome flooding has a high network overhead; it overcome the PROPHET routing protocol packets in the network may be an infinite number, which greatly reduces the possibility of degradation for the direct deliver.Another hybrid forwarding strategy, redundancy and utility based mixed Increasing utility- based DTN routing mechanism. According PROPHET improvement: each message associated with a utility value, each node also has a utility value to the other nodes, using the two utility value to decide whether the message forwarding to encounter node. Since reducing the number delivered, but each time were delivered to a large utili