网站大量收购独家精品文档,联系QQ:2885784924

revisiting_the_role_of_language_in_spatial_cognition_categorical_perception_of_spatial_relations_in_english_and_korean_speakers.psychon_bull_re_Image_Marked文档.pdf

revisiting_the_role_of_language_in_spatial_cognition_categorical_perception_of_spatial_relations_in_english_and_korean_speakers.psychon_bull_re_Image_Marked文档.pdf

  1. 1、本文档共6页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
revisiting_the_role_of_language_in_spatial_cognition_categorical_perception_of_spatial_relations_in_english_and_korean_speakers.psychon_bull_re_Image_Marked文档

Psychon Bull Rev DOI 10.3758/s13423-017-1268-x BRIEF REPORT Revisiting the role of language in spatial cognition: Categorical perception of spatial relations in English and Korean speakers Kevin J. Holmes 1 Kelsey Moty2 Terry Regier3 # Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2017 Abstract The spatial relation of support has been regarded as Keywords Spatial cognition . Categorical perception . universally privileged in nonlinguistic cognition and immune to Language and thought . Lateralization . Bilinguals the influence of language. English, but not Korean, obligatorily distinguishes support from nonsupport via basic spatial terms. Despite this linguistic difference, previous research suggests that Languages differ in how they partition the world through their English and Korean speakers show comparable nonlinguistic words and grammatical devices (Malt Majid, 2013). Such sensitivity to the support/nonsupport distinction. Here, using a linguistic differences suggest the possibility of corresponding paradigm previously found to elicit cross-language differences in differences in nonlinguistic cognition, consistent with the clas- color discrimination, we provide evidence for a difference in sic hypothesis that language shapes thought (Whorf, 1956). sensitivity to support/nonsupport between native English Support for this possibility comes from studies showing that speakers and native Korean speakers who were late English speakers of different languages perform differently—in a learners and tested in a context that privileged Korean. manner predicted by the semantic differences among the lan- Whereas the former group showed categorical perception (CP) guages—on tasks that do not require language (see Wolff when discriminating spatial scenes capturing the support/ Holmes, 2011). Other research suggests, however,

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

seunk + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档