Making Markets Work How Domestic Capital Market Reform Can Improve Access to Global Finance资料.doc
- 1、本文档共44页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
Making Markets Work How Domestic Capital Market Reform Can Improve Access to Global Finance资料
Making Markets Work:
How Domestic Capital Market Reform Can Improve Access to Global Finance
Peter Blair Henry* and Peter Lombard Lorentzen**
April 2003
1. Introduction
Over a decade ago Robert Lucas asked the following question: why doesn’t capital flow from rich to poor countries? His point was simple. Less-developed countries have lower capital-to-labor ratios than do rich countries. Under standard neoclassical assumptions, this means that the rate of return to capital in these countries is higher than in the developed world. In order to equalize returns, profit-seeking capitalists should export capital to the developing world until risk-adjusted rates of return are equalized. In other words, market pressures should lead to a positive net resource transfer to less-developed countries, thus boosting their growth rates, and Lucas was encouraging us to think about the obstacles that prevented this flow from occurring.
At the time Lucas asked his question, the prevailing wisdom was that capital flows to developing countries were a good idea. More than ten years later, intellectual opinion has shifted. A heated debate over capital account liberalization has followed in the wake of financial crises in Asia, Russia and Latin America. Opponents of the process now argue that capital account liberalization invites speculative hot money flows, increases the likelihood of financial crises, and brings no discernible economic benefits. Some economists have gone so far as to assert that open capital markets may be detrimental to economic development (Bhagwhati, 1998; Rodrik, 1998; Stiglitz 2002).
With the debate over the wisdom of free capital flows still raging, it is at least a little presumptuous to write a paper that explains how developing countries can increase both their integration with world capital markets and access to external finance without first addressing the underlying assumption that this is beneficial.
Section 2 of the paper establishes that there
您可能关注的文档
- 中国在线视频行业年度监测报告.Image.Marked5.Image.Marked.pdf
- shoppingmall南京水游城购物中心案例分析8_Image_Marked.pdf
- 复星邢世平新医改下投资并购模式的创新_Image_Marked.pdf
- 中国商业WiFi行业研究报告.Image.Marked5.Image.Marked.pdf
- 双11美妆、母婴电商行业大数据情报通_Image_Marked.pdf
- 混凝土外加剂公司质量管理体系认证-管理文件-制度文件.docx
- Analysis of corporate solvency Factors of _ easy to ignore the network资料.doc
- Corporate solvency analysis资料.doc
- Pedagogy - the plight of education in the cultivation of individual creativity and its way out资料.doc
- On the plight of education in the cultivation of individual creativity and its way out资料.doc
文档评论(0)