Animal ights课件.pptVIP

Animal Rights vs.Animal Research:a Modest Proposal Part one:paragraph one It shows the contradiction between animal researchers and the opponents whether we should use animal in the research or not Part two:paragraph two Because of the abstention(弃权）of the opposition,the author mentioned his proposal--abstain from the benefits of animal research. Part three:paragraph three to eleven The author expressed his proposal carefully including a form with four items in it. main idea This text is a message about animal rights, in which the author gives a modest proposal to animal research 1.refuse a cornonary（冠状） bypass operation and fix any heart defect their child may be born with. 2.refuse th give child a vaccine（疫苗） that was tried first on animal. a 3.refuse to accept the suggestion which was derived from animal studies. 4.refuse to get a chemotherapy（化学治疗） when developed a malignancy（恶性肿瘤） or suegical treatment if the drug were administered first to animal. conflict For animal lovers, some thought, in their name of love, oppose the use of any animals in any medical research, while many of the others acknowledge the need for animal subjects in some medical studies. So the opponents of animal research and the researchers haven’t any comparison. author’s opinion In author’s opinion, the animal rights question can be answered by exactly that tactic: the opposition’s abstention that isn’t from debate and from performing research those who are not researchers is not meaningful. And the author proposes that the protesters— and every citizen they can enlist– abstain from the benefits of animal research. author’s suggestion To assist them, the author offers a modest proposal, and suggests that we adopt a legal release form, readily available to all patients This form should resolve the issue once and for all. And this “ Animal Research Advance Directive” would like this: You oppose the doctors to do animal experiment, while you ask them to c