论“保护的责任”之构建与实施-on the construction and implementation of.docxVIP

下载本文档

2
0
约5.44万字
约 44页
2018-05-28 发布于上海
举报
版权申诉

论“保护的责任”之构建与实施-on the construction and implementation of.docx

1、原创力文档（book118）网站文档一经付费（服务费），不意味着购买了该文档的版权，仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用，不得用于商业用途，未经授权，严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等，侵权必究。。
2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传，本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺！文档内容仅供研究参考，付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费，意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险，本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务；查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档，您可以点击这里二次下载。
3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等，请点击“版权申诉”（推荐），也可以打举报电话：400-050-0827(电话支持时间：9:00-18:30)。
4、该文档为VIP文档，如果想要下载，成为VIP会员后，下载免费。
5、成为VIP后，下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后，不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
6、成为VIP后，您将拥有八大权益，权益包括：VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传，每下载1次，网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等，对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档

论“保护的责任”之构建与实施-on the construction and implementation of

AbstractResponsibility to protect is produced as a new theory in early twenty-first Century, which is mainly derived from the profound historical background of how the international community makes a react in the face of humanitarian disasters. The theory is established on the basis of the principle of sovereignty and adapted to the new security concept and the requirements of the international protection of human rights. Since it was proposed , the theory caused a widespread concern of the international community , as frequently seen in international documents and reports it constantly enriched and developed its own connotations at the theoretical level, and finally determined the specific concept at the 2005 World Summit Outcome, that is the sovereign state has the responsibility to protect its people from genocide , war crimes, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity , when the sovereign state is unable or unwilling to protect its people from the harm of the four crime , the international community should take the responsibility to protect . However, there are still differences in other respects.The emergence of the responsibility to protect has brought some impact to the traditional theory of international law and also is distinguished from the early humanitarian intervention. On one hand , it acknowledges the inherent meaning of national sovereignty , agrees that a sovereign state has the highest , exclusive jurisdiction of their internal affairs, on the other hand it enriched the sovereignty with the new era of development of the concept of internalization of responsibility, which means sovereignty implies responsibility , and ultimately come to the conclusion that responsibility to protect hasn’t weakened national sovereignty as some scholars worried as , but in the new context of the times it establishs a responsible sovereignty . Some scholars think, responsibility to protect is just a new phrase of humanitarian intervention, but we find that it is a w