网络链接服务提供商商标侵权责任分析-analysis of trademark infringement liability of network link service provider.docxVIP

网络链接服务提供商商标侵权责任分析-analysis of trademark infringement liability of network link service provider.docx

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
网络链接服务提供商商标侵权责任分析-analysis of trademark infringement liability of network link service provider

AbstractTrademark has been playing an important role in the online shopping which is on a basis of internet technology. This phenomenon brings an result that the frequency of trademark infringement becomes more and more quickly and the owner of trademark has bought dearly cost. The difficulty of administration of justice follows this process. And due to the difficulty of affirming infringement that the internet technology has brought about, as far as the gap between the quickly development of internet technology and the trademark legislation, the owner of trademark is in an embarrassing position. The hyperlink businessmen who plays an important role in the process of the formation and development of the internet technology, is of important significance to study the trademark infringement in the realm. The hyperlink businessman does not implement the direct infringement in essence. He only plays the role of bridge and passage. This characteristics determines that the service which is provided by the hyperlink businessman constitutes the secondary infringement. Also we must take the basic action of the hyperlink on the internet into account when we make the judgment if one behavior constitutes infringement. There exists dispute on the criterion of liability about intellectual property. However, we should apply the criterion of fault liability on the liability of the hyperlink businessman. In this way, it has no difference in comparison with the traditional infringement. But we should notice that how to make a judgment on the subjective fault is an important and difficult problem. We also should consider the interaction relationship between the quickly development of the internet and attention duty of the hyperlink businessman and the actual regulatory capacity and operation cost of his. We should get the balance between reducing the risks of the hyperlink businessman’s infringement and each party’s interest. Only in this way can we get the balance between the protecti

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

xyz118 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档