huan环境科学英语.doc

Envir??onmen??tal hazar??ds truly?? affec??ting healt??h statu??s in the count??ry are not those?? recei??ving the highe??st atten??tion, wheth??er measu??red by publi??c opini??on polls?? , news cover??age, congr??essio??nal actio??ns ,or gover??nment?? expen??ditur??es. 环境危害影??响国家的健??康状况而不??是真正接受??的最高关注??,是否以民意??调查来衡量??,新闻报道,国会行动,或政府支出??。 Indoo??r air pollu??tion ,in its vario??us forms??, recei??ves relat??ively?? littl??e atten??tion compa??red with outdo??or sourc??es and yet proba??bly accou??nts for as much ,if not more, poor healt??h .Hazar??ds waste?? dumpe??d ,on the other?? hand, which?? are diffi??cult to assoc??iate with any measu??rable?? ill healt??h ,attra??ct much atten??tion and resou??rces .The same chemi??cals in the form of commo??n consu??mer produ??cts ,such as house??hold clean??ers ,pesti??cides??, and fuel (gasol??ine), accou??nt for much more expos??ure and ill healt??h and yet compa??rativ??ely littl??e conce??rn from the publi??c. 室内空气污??染,各种形式,得到相对较??少的关注与??室外来源,但可能占一??样多,如果不是更??多,健康状况不??佳。危险废物倾??倒,另一方面,很难将其与??任何可测量??的不健康,吸引了太多??的关注和资??源。相同的化学??物质的形式??共同的消费??产品,如家用清洁??剂、杀虫剂,和燃料(汽油),占更多的暴??露和健康不??良,但相对小公??众的关注。 Sever??al expla??natio??ns exist?? for this diffe??rence?? in perce??ption??s ,the major?? ones relat??ing to the fact that the publi??c uses a numbe??r of crite??ria other?? than healt??h risk to estab??lish its conce??rns .Howev??er ,this misma??tch betwe??en real and perce??ived risks?? has signi??fican??t conse??quenc??es .In a world?? of finit??e finan??cial resou??rces ,when money?? is used to reduc??e risks?? that have littl??e measu??rable?? healt??h impac??t ,there?? is less to spend?? on inter??venti??ons that addre??ss more signi??fican??t risks??. 几种解释这??种差异存在??于认知,主要的影响??因素,公众使用许??多健康风险??以外的标准??建立的担忧??。然而,这和现实之??间的不匹配??风险具有显??著的后果。在金融资源??有限的世界??,金钱是用来??减少几乎没??有可衡量的??健康影响的??风险,减少花在干??预措施,解决更重要??的风险。 Some resea??rcher??s argue?? that the publi??c is frequ??ently?? misle??d by the polit??ics of publi??c healt??h and e