语言型多属性群决策方法若干理论分析及应用-theoretical analysis and application of linguistic multi-attribute group decision-making method.docxVIP

to solve the case where elements in evaluation matrix take the form of linguistic variables. In the developed model, the LWAA operator is selected as the synthesis evaluation function. The overall performance level thus is obtained in terms of the maximum grade of membership rule. In group setting, the LWAA operator is again used to aggregate individual preference and the group collective evaluation matrix is got.Finally, group decision making problem based on incomplete multiplicative and complementary judgement matrices is discussed. The two kinds of linguistic judgement matrices are transformed to corresponding numerical judgement matrices at first place. Based on the consistency of multiplicative judgement matrix and addition consistency of complementary judgement matrix, a constrained optimization model is therefore constructed. Its explicit solution under some situation and the properties of the given solution are also discussed. The ranking of alternatives or selection of the most desirable alternatives can be directly obtained according to the presented method.Through out this thesis, we give some examples and applications to demonstrate and verify the proposed approach.Keywords： Multiple attribute decision making (MADM), Maximizing deviations, Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method, Judgement matrix, Linguistic variables.目录中文摘要..........................................................................................................................................I英文摘要........................................................................................................................................ II1 绪论......................................................................................................................................... 11.1 决策及多属性决策 ................................................................................................................... 11.2 语言型多属性决策及研究现状 .....................................................................