- 1、本文档共61页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
spine杂志201701下半期摘要翻译ppt课件
ABSTRACT Objective. The purpose of this study was to determine implementing an accelerated protocol could decrease our average hospital stay and what impact this had on postoperative pain management. 目的:本研究的目的是确定实施加速方案可以减少我们的平均住院时间和对术后疼痛管理有什么影响。 ABSTRACT Summary of Background Data. To our knowledge, no prior studies have reviewed the effect of an accelerated discharge protocol on postoperative pain control for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) following posterior spinal fusion. 背景资料:据我们所知,先前没有研究报道加速出院方案对青少年特发性脊柱侧凸(AIS)后路脊柱融合术后疼痛控制的效果。 ABSTRACT Methods. This is a retrospective review of all consecutive patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion (PSF) for AIS before (June 1, 2008–May 31, 2013 = traditional protocol) and after (June 1, 2013–October 22, 2014 = accelerated protocol) protocol implementation. Subjective response to the FACES Pain Intensity scale was collected for each postoperative day while in the hospital by the nursing staff. 方法:这是一个对所有接受后路脊柱融合(PSF)AIS患者的回顾,2008年6月1日至2013年5月31日使用传统方案,2013年6月1日至2014年10月22日使用术后快速康复。主观反应是评估住院每一天的疼痛强度视觉模拟化量表。 ABSTRACT Results. There were 194 patients in the traditional pathway and 90 patients in the accelerated pathway. No significant differences in age at surgery, sex, or number of levels fused were present between the groups. Patients managed under the accelerated discharge had an average hospital stay of 3.7 days compared with 5.0 days for the traditional discharge (P 0.001). There was no increased incidence of wound complications between the two groups [3.6% (7/194) vs. 3.3% (3/90), P = 0.91] or readmission [1.5% (3/194) vs. 4.4% (4/90), P = 0.213]. Hospital charges for postoperative care were significantly less in the accelerated discharge group than in the traditional group ($18,360 vs. $23,640, P 0.0001). This corresponded to a 22% ($5280/$23,640) decrease in postoperative hospital charges. Patients had a small (1 point change on FACES pain scale) but statistically significant increase in pain on postoperative
您可能关注的文档
- sd大鼠骨髓间充质干细胞体外分离ppt课件.ppt
- sdn技术原理介绍ppt课件.pptx
- sedative-hypnoticsppt课件.ppt
- seminari辅酶q10的生物化学性质刘姝ppt课件.ppt
- Sensitivity Analysis of Enumerated Trees of Increasing Boolean 枚举树增加布尔的敏感性分析.ppt
- Selling an Idea or a Product:推销一个想法或产品.ppt
- sepsis中乳酸与免疫抑制相关ppt课件.pptx
- SFT洗面奶新产品计划和终端营销履行计划-20页.ppt
- sicu基本知识点ppt课件.ppt
- shopping mall与百货商场的差别.ppt
最近下载
- 2024年4月广东深圳市光明区马田街道办事处招聘一般专干及笔试历年典型考题及考点剖析附答案带详解.docx
- 文秘技能大赛题库完整.pdf
- 建筑工程图集 07SJ504-1 隔断、隔断墙(一).pdf
- 班级管理方案和班委职责与班级管理条例(范本)合集.doc VIP
- 2025年广东省高中语文学业水平合格考试卷试题(含答案详解).pdf VIP
- 金融监管学银行监管讲义课件.pptx
- 高中体育与健康_篮球 传切配合 教学课件设计.ppt
- 二 《简单相信,傻傻坚持》(教学课件)-【中职专用】高二语文精讲课堂(高教版2023·职业模块).pptx VIP
- 人教版《劳动教育》九年级 劳动项目二《三餐有营养》课件.pptx
- 2024年中考语文一轮复习(全国)(老师用)议论文写作(练习).pdf VIP
文档评论(0)