网站大量收购独家精品文档,联系QQ:2885784924

纳洛酮与醒脑静联合抢救COPD并Ⅱ型呼吸衰竭临床观察.docVIP

纳洛酮与醒脑静联合抢救COPD并Ⅱ型呼吸衰竭临床观察.doc

此“医疗卫生”领域文档为创作者个人分享资料,不作为权威性指导和指引,仅供参考
  1. 1、本文档共11页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  5. 5、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  6. 6、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  7. 7、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  8. 8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
纳洛酮与醒脑静联合抢救COPD并Ⅱ型呼吸衰竭临床观察

纳洛酮与醒脑静联合抢救COPD并Ⅱ型呼吸衰竭临床观察   [摘要] 目的 探讨纳洛酮与醒脑静联合抢救慢性阻塞性肺部疾病(COPD)并Ⅱ型呼吸衰竭的临床效果。 方法 将256例COPD并Ⅱ型呼吸衰竭患者随机分为治疗组与对照组。治疗组128例采用纳洛酮联合醒脑静治疗,对照组128例用常规方法治疗。 结果 治疗组总有效率(98.44%),对照组总有效率为95.31%,两组比较差异无统计学意义;而治疗组显效率为88.28%,明显高于对照组52.34%,差异有统计学意义;血气分析:两组比较差异无统计学意义;动脉血气分析指标:动脉血氧分压(PaO2)明显高于对照组(P 0.05),差异无统计学意义。 结论 纳洛酮与醒脑静联合治疗性阻塞性肺气肿并Ⅱ型呼吸衰竭临床疗效确切。   [关键词] 纳洛酮;醒脑静;Ⅱ型呼吸衰竭   [中图分类号] R563.8 [文献标识码] B [文章编号] 1673-9701(2013)07-0130-03   Clinical observation of the naloxone-Xingnaojing joint rescue COPD and typeⅡrespiratory failure   ZHU Minghui1 HU Guangfen1 LI Jinglin2   1.The Emergency Department of the First Peoples Hospital of Guangzhou Hedong Branch, Guangzhou 510180, China;2.The Emergency Department, the First Peoples Hospital of Guangzhou, Guangzhou 510180, China   [Abstract] Objective To investigate the effectiveness of naloxone with Xingnaojing joint rescue chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and type Ⅱ respiratory failure clinical observation. Methods A total of 256 patients with COPD and type Ⅱ respiratory failure were randomly divided into two groups: the treatment group and the control group. 128 cases in the treatment group, be treated by naloxone with Xingnaojing of treatment, 128 cases in control group be treated by traditional methods. Results The overall effective rate for treatment group was 98.44%, and the overall effective rate of the control group is 95.31%. There were not significant differences on overall effectiveness between the two groups. While the dominant effective rate for treatment group is 88.28%, that of the control group was 52.34%, the dominant effectiveness for treatment group was significantly higher than the control groups. Blood gas analysis indicated the treatment group and the control group showed no significant differences. The arterial blood gas analysis indicated the arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2) was significantly higher than that in the control groups (P 0.05) and there is not significant differences on PaCO2.

文档评论(0)

130****9768 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档