The Obama Administrations Tax Reform Proposals :奥巴马政府的税收改革的建议.pptVIP

The Obama Administrations Tax Reform Proposals :奥巴马政府的税收改革的建议.ppt

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
The Obama Administrations Tax Reform Proposals :奥巴马政府的税收改革的建议

The Obama Administration’s Tax Reform Proposals Concerning Controlled Foreign Corporations Daniel Shaviro NYU Law School U.S. political background Has anything changed politically? Behind the Obama Administration’s proposals The main proposals for CFCs (1) Deduction disallowance Effects of deduction disallowance (2) Foreign tax credit changes (3) Use of check-the-box to avoid subpart F Check-the-box proposal, cont. The bottom line? * What common features for U.S. politics of (a) international taxation and (b) the death penalty? The U.S. international tax ceasefire-in-place reflects 3 competing political elements: 1) Pro-worldwide: tax reform/base-broadening on progressivity grounds (!), plus fear of job flight / runaway factories. 2) Pro-exemption: “competitiveness” interest group politics. 3) Pro-foreign tax credit: popular aversion to “double taxation,” reinterpreted by academics as concern for worldwide efficiency (via CEN). End result: hard to move either way; huge tax planning costs relative to revenue raised. U.S. politics is VERY slow to notice WW trends (e.g., rising tax competition, other countries’ shift towards exemption). Interest group politics is (if anything) more pervasive than ever, seemingly good news for the pro-exemption side. BUT – in overall U.S. politics the rightward shift of 2000-2008 has been more than reversed (for reasons having nothing to do with U.S. international taxation). This potentially favors the pro-worldwide side even though, on this issue standing alone, there has been no shift to the left. Addressing “tax breaks” for “runaway factories” was a campaign talking point – there are desperate revenue needs, few politically appealing targets. Hence, no surprise to see a proposal purporting to raise $200 billion through 2019, with a focus on controversial tax planning. In the short run, proposal is (mostly?) going nowhere: higher priorities, lack of Treasury tax staff, Congressional opposition. But clearly an important marker th

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

wuyoujun92 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档