王士祯、但明伦《聊斋志异》评点比拟.pdf

中文摘要 中文摘要 本文欲在比较中还原《聊斋志异》王士祯评语、但明伦评语的各自特点和价 值，并以此作为对清代小说批评和小说理论发展演进情况的追踪。全文论述从以 下三个层面展开：首先，在接受层，比较王士祯、但明伦对《聊斋志异》的理解 和定位，还原两家评点整体风貌。其次，在方法层，比较王士祯、但明伦各自文 学批评方法和批评旨趣，还原两家评点细部特征。最后，在价值层，比较两家评 点各自影响，还原两家评点的价值体系。 经比较，发现王士祯秉承以诗境为核心的诗性传统，对小说文体特征缺乏认 识。其批语虽具有外在传播价值，却在旨趣上继续沿袭传统诗论的路子。相比之 下，但明伦从文章学角度出发，所做评点更加切合小说文体特征，同时关注到文 言小说叙事结构和技巧的理论总结，代表了清代晚期小说理论和批评的“觉醒”。 关键词：《聊斋志异》；小说评点；王士祯；但明伦 I Abstract Abstract This paper focuses on the differences between Wang Shi-zhen’s comments and Dan Ming-lun’s comments on Liao Zhai Zhi Yi, which shows the evolution track of novel theory criticism in Qing Dynasty. Firstly, Wang and Dan had different understanding about Liao Zhai Zhi Y i, so their comments show different styles. Secondly, they used different methods to give their comments so their comments have different features. Thirdly, these two kinds of comments have different values and influences. Owing to the inheritance of poetic tradition, Wang Shi-zhen put less attention to novel writing styles. In spite of its influence, his novel critique followed the way of poetry critics. In comparison, Dan Ming-lun managed the theory of ancient prose in his literature comments of novels, which paid more attention to novel writing styles and narrative techniques, and marked the awakening of novel theory criticism in late Qing Dynasty. Keywords ：Liao Zhai Zhi Yi; novel critiques; Wang Shi-zhen; Dan Ming-lun II 目录 目 录 中文摘要 错误!未定义书签。 Abstract 错误!未定义书签。 绪论 1 一、 《聊斋志异》评点概说 1 二、 《聊斋志异》评点归类 1 三、研究意义和研究方法 2 四、研究现状综述 3