秀传医疗社团法人秀传纪念医院实证医学中心.DOCVIP

秀传医疗社团法人秀传纪念医院实证医学中心.DOC

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
秀传医疗社团法人秀传纪念医院实证医学中心

秀傳醫療社團法人秀傳紀念醫院實證醫學中心 住院醫師升等實證醫學報告 姓名 卡號 科別 升等職等 電話 指導教師 Foreground Questions Type of Question □Therapy □Diagnosis □Prognosis □Harm □prevention PICO Patient or Problem Intervention Comparison Outcome Keyword MeSH Search Strategy Database Strategy (文獻搜尋過程, keyword、布林邏輯) Pubmed Cochrane Library Citations Evidence Level Critical Appraisal Skills Programme(CASP):Screening Questions 1. Did the study ask a clearly-focused question? □Yes □Can’t tell □No Consider if the question is ‘focused’ in terms of: – the population studied – the intervention given – the outcomes considered 2. Was this a randomised controlled trial (RCT) and was it appropriately so? Consider: □Yes □Can’t tell □No – why this study was carried out as an RCT – if this was the right research approach for the question being asked Is it worth continuing? Detailed Questions 3. Were participants appropriately allocated to intervention and control groups? Consider: □Yes □Can’t tell □No – how participants were allocated to intervention and control groups. Was the process truly random? – whether the method of allocation was described. Was a method used to balance the randomization, e.g. stratification? – how the randomization schedule was generated and how a participant was allocated to a study group – if the groups were well balanced. Are any differences between the groups at entry to the trial reported? – if there were differences reported that might have explained any outcome(s) (confounding) 4. Were participants, staff and study personnel ‘blind’ to participants’ study group? Consider: □Yes □Can’t tell □No – the fact that blinding is not always possible – if every effort was made to achieve bl

文档评论(0)

ailuojue + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档