mFOLFOX6方案与PF方案同步放疗治疗非手术食管癌近期疗效观察.docVIP

mFOLFOX6方案与PF方案同步放疗治疗非手术食管癌近期疗效观察.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
mFOLFOX6方案与PF方案同步放疗治疗非手术食管癌近期疗效观察

mFOLFOX6方案与PF方案同步放疗治疗非手术食管癌近期疗效观察   【摘要】 目的 ?Ρ确鞘质跏彻馨┗颊卟扇?mFOLFOX6方案同步放化疗与传统PF方案同步放化疗的疗效差异。方法 60例Ⅱ/ Ⅲ 期非手术食管鳞癌患者, 随机分为试验组(27例)和对照组(33例)。两组均采用三维适形放疗(3D-CRT)。试验组放疗期间予以mFOLFOX6方案同步化疗, 对照组放疗期间予以PF方案同步化疗。分析两组近期疗效、治疗毒性反应。结果 试验组近期总有效率为92.59%, 高于对照组的75.76%, 但差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。两组主要毒性为骨髓抑制、消化道反应及神经毒性反应。骨髓抑制主要表现为白细胞减少, 其中试验组Ⅲ~Ⅳ度骨髓抑制发生率为22.2%(6/27), 对照组为27.3%(9/33), 比较差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。消化道反应主要表现为放射性食管炎、恶心、呕吐。两组均未发生Ⅲ度以上食管炎;试验组恶心、呕吐发生率29.6%(8/27) 对照组为60.6%(20/33), 比较差异有统计学意义(P=0.0170.05)。所有不良反应经对症治疗后均可缓解, 患者能良好耐受。结论 与传统PF方案同步放化疗比较, mFOLFOX6方案同步放化疗治疗非手术食管鳞癌患者近期总有效率较高, 近期疗效好, 不良反应可耐受, 值得进一步研究。   【关键词】 非手术食管癌;同步放化疗;mFOLFOX6方案;PF方案   DOI:10.14163/j.cnki.11-5547/r.2017.08.012   【Abstract】 Objective To compare difference of curative effects between mFOLFOX6 regimen radiochemotherapy and PF regimen in concurrent radiochemotherapy for non-operative esophagus cancer patients. Methods A total of stage Ⅱ/Ⅲ non-operative esophagus squamous carcinoma patients were randomly divided into experimental group (27 cases) and control group (33 cases). Both groups received three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT). The experimental group received mFOLFOX6 regimen radiochemotherapy in treatment, and the control group received PF regimen in concurrent radiochemotherapy instead. Analysis was made on short-term curative effect and toxic reactions in treatment in the two groups. Results The experimental group had higher short-term total effective rate as 92.59% than 75.76% in the control group, while their difference had no statistical significance (P0.05). Main toxic reactions in both groups included myelosuppression, gastrointestinal reactions and neurotoxic reactions, with leucopenia as the main manifestation in myelosuppression. The experimental group had incidence of grade Ⅲ~Ⅳ myelosuppression as 22.2% (6/27), which was 27.3% (9/33) in the control group, and the difference had no statistical significance (P0.05). Main manifestations of gastrointestinal reactions included radiation esopha

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

3471161553 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档