环太平洋数字图书馆联盟简称.pptVIP

Digital Discovery Access Methods Task Force Report PRDLA 2005 Hawaii Task Force Charge Evaluate the various technical options identified at the Taiwan 2005 meeting to provide patron access to PRDLA member digital resources and recommend on how to proceed. Technical options considered Non-mediated book requests Article requesting tools Z39.50 Gateway tools Canned Searches tools Metasearch tools OAI Service tools SRB Data Grid Google Scholar Non-mediatied book requesting Products III’s INN-Reach Fretwell-Downing’s VDX SirsiDynix’s URSA Content All or subset of member’s OPAC Examples Circuit * San Diego Summit * Oregon Washington HKALL * Hong Kong Non-mediated book requesting Costs Initial: High (hardware, installation, staff) Ongoing: High (maintenance + shipping across Pacific) Pros Saves staff time Potential for large shared collections Cons Potential for lost, damaged, materials Article requesting tools Products OCLC Worldcat RAPID ILL (Colorado State University Libraries) OCLC Worldcat High initial and ongoing records and holdings maintenance costs High per transaction charge RAPID ILL 60% cheaper, than traditional ILL (OCLC, RLIN, etc.) Quicker, 3.4 days turnaround time borrowing More exact, 93% fill rate Works with or without INN-Reach system If Inside INN-Reach, patrons can make requests without leaving INN-Reach system Can be used for print and e-journals, subject to license restrictions – see Yale ILL Project Database Examples Elsevier e-journals Can send anything, must be printed first faxed American Chemical Soc e-journals Can send anything, in any transmission method Article requesting tools HKU’s RAPID e-journals The Journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry Datastream Jstor Business Periodicals Ondisc Wiley Interscience China Journal Net (CNKI) American Chemical Society Blackwell Publishing Company of Biologists Article requesting tools RAPID PODs (can belong to more than 1) ARL pod (University of OR, HKU) Katrina pod PRDLA pod? Costs, eac