- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
基于子午流注纳子法予四子散外敷治疗阿片类药物所致便秘临床研究
基于子午流注纳子法予四子散外敷治疗阿片类药物所致便秘临床研究
【摘要】 目的 ?^察基于子午流注纳子法予四子散外敷治疗阿片类药物所致便秘的疗效。
方法 100例恶性肿瘤合并癌痛给予阿片类药物出现便秘的患者, 随机分为对照组和治疗组, 各50例。
对照组患者给予乳果糖通便治疗, 治疗组患者基于子午流注纳子法予四子散外敷治疗。观察两组近期临床效果、治疗前后排便时间及远期疗效。结果 治疗组治愈5例, 显效16例, 有效22例, 无效
7例, 总有效率为86.0%;对照组治愈4例, 显效13例, 有效17例, 无效16例, 总有效率为68.0%;治疗组总有效率高于对照组, 差异有统计学意义(P0.05);治疗后, 治疗组排便时间短于对照组, 差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。治疗组再发便秘15例, 对照组再发便秘31例, 两组比较差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。治疗组再发便秘时间为(10.3±1.5)d, 长于对照组的(6.8±3.5)d, 差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论 基于子午流注纳子法予四子散外敷治疗阿片类药物所致便秘, 疗效满意, 值得推广。
【关键词】 子午流注纳子法;四子散;便秘;阿片类药物
DOI:10.14163/j.cnki.11-5547/r.2018.04.048
Clinical study of Ziwu Liuzhu Nazi method and external application of Sizisan in the treatment of opioids-induced constipation RONG Jing-yu, LIN Qing, CHEN Jie, et al. Division One of Tumor, Guangdong Foshan Shunde District Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Foshan 528303, China
【Abstract】 Objective To observe the efficacy of Ziwu Liuzhu Nazi method and external application of Sizisan in the treatment of opioids-induced constipation. Methods A total of 100 malignant tumor and cancer pain patients with opioids-induced constipation were randomly divided into control group and treatment group, with 50 cases in each group. The control group was treated with lactulose for defecation, and the treatment group was treated with Ziwu Liuzhu Nazi method and external application of Sizisan. Observation were made on short-term clinical effect, defecation time before and after treatment and long-term effect between the two groups. Results The treatment group had 5 cured cases, 16 excellent cases, 22 effective cases and 7 ineffective cases, with total effective rate as 86.0%, while the control group had 4 cured cases, 13 excellent cases, 17 effective cases and 16 ineffective cases, with total effective rate as 68.0%. The treatment group had higher total effective rate than the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P0.05). After treatment, the treatment group had shorter defecation ti
原创力文档


文档评论(0)