皮瓣修复治疗手及前臂皮肤烧伤瘢痕的疗效观察.docVIP

皮瓣修复治疗手及前臂皮肤烧伤瘢痕的疗效观察.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
皮瓣修复治疗手及前臂皮肤烧伤瘢痕的疗效观察   [摘要] 目的 探讨不同皮瓣用于手及前臂皮肤烧伤瘢痕修复治疗的临床疗效。 方法 选择我院2011年6月~ 2013年4月间收治的60例手及前臂皮肤烧伤瘢痕患者作为观察对象,随机分为观察组和对照组。其中对照组30例,使用股前外侧皮瓣进行瘢痕修复治疗,观察组30例,使用腹股沟皮瓣进行瘢痕修复治疗,然后观察两组患者的皮瓣成活率,皮瓣断蒂时间,以及皮瓣下感染等并发症发生情况,并进行对比分析。 结果 经过分析显示,观察组患者治疗后的皮瓣成活率明显高于对照组,皮瓣断蒂时间明显短于对照组,皮瓣下感染发生率明显低于对照组,两组相比差异具有统计?学意义(P0.05)。 结论 对于手及前臂皮肤烧伤瘢痕的修复治疗,使用腹股沟皮瓣的临床疗效明显比股前外侧皮瓣,成活率高,皮瓣断蒂时间短,并发症少,既安全,操作又简单,值得临床予以推广。   [关键词] 皮肤烧伤瘢痕;皮瓣修复;股前外侧;腹股沟;疗效   [中图分类号] R644 [文献标识码] B [文章编号] 2095-0616(2014)04-179-03   Observation on the curative effect of skin flap for repairing the burnt scars of hands and forearm skin   LIN Lianduo CAI Xiaoyan   Department of Burns and Orthopedic Surgery,the First Peoples Hospital of Shunde District in Foshan City, Foshan 528300,China   [Abstract] Objective To explore the clinical curative effect of different skin flap for repairing the burnt scars of hands and forearm skin. Methods 60 cases with burnt scars of hands and forearm skin in our hospital from June 2011 to April 2013 were chosen as the research objects,who were randomly divided into the observation group and the control group.Of which 30 cases in the control group were treated with femoral anterolateral flap for repairing the burnt scars,while 30 cases in observation group were treated with groin flap for repairing the burnt scars,and then the survival rate of skin flap,flap broken time, and infection complications under the skin flap of patients in the two groups were observed,compared and analyzed. Results The analysis showed that the survival rate of skin flap of patients in the observation group after treatment was significantly higher than that in the control group, the flap broken time was significantly shorter, the incidence of infection under the skin flap was significantly lower, there were statistically significant differences between the two groups(P0.05). Conclusion Compared with the femoral anterolateral flap for repairing the burnt scars of hands and forearm skin,the groin flap for repairing the

文档评论(0)

聚文惠 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档