- 1、本文档共11页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 5、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 6、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 7、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
循证护理配合微型钢板内固定治疗手部掌骨颈骨折临床分析
循证护理配合微型钢板内固定治疗手部掌骨颈骨折临床分析
[摘要] 目的 分析循?C护理配合微型钢板内固定治疗手部掌骨颈骨折的临床效果。方法 方便选取2016年1月―2017年6月该院收治的手部掌骨颈骨折患者96例,将患者随机分为两组,观察组和对照组患者各48例,观察组患者使用循证护理法配合微型钢板内固定法进行恢复治疗,对照组患者使用常规护理法配合克氏针内固定法进行恢复治疗,将两者的临床效果、并发症率和护理满意度进行比较和总结。结果 观察组48例手部掌骨颈骨折患者在接受上述治疗之后,总有效率为95.83%;而对照组为75.00%。观察组患者治疗总有效率明显高于对照组患者,组间治疗效果差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。观察组的感染率为6.25%,肌腱粘连和关节僵硬率为0.00%,而对照组分别为18.75%、10.41%和6.25%,观察组的并发症率普遍低于对照组(P0.05)。观察组中手术患者的术后24 h疼痛评分为(2.5±0.2)分,明显低于对照组(3.1±0.5)分,而且观察组的护理满意度评分为(97.5±2.1)分,明显高于对照组(81.4±4.5)分,其差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论 临床上在治疗手部掌骨颈骨折时,可以采用循证护理配合微型钢板内固定治疗的治疗方法,能有效并积极地使患者恢复健康,获得非常理想的治疗效果,值得在临床上大力推广。
[关键词] 微型钢板内固定;手部掌骨颈骨折;克氏针内固定法;循证护理
[中图分类号] R687 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-0742(2018)01(b)-0155-03
[Abstract] Objective To analyze the clinical effect of evidence-based nursing and internal fixation with mini-plate?in treatment of fracture of metacarpusl neck bones. Methods 96 cases of patients with fracture of metacarpusl neck bones admitted and treated in our hospital from January 2016 to June 2017 were convenient selected and randomly divided into two groups with 48 cases in each, the observation group used the evidence-based nursing and internal fixation with mini-plate, while the control group used the routine nursing and Kirschner wire internal fixation for rehabilitation treatment, and the clinical effect, complication rate and nursing satisfactory degree were compared and summarized. Results After treatment, the total effective rate in the observation group was obviously higher than that in the control group(95.83% vs 75.00%), and the difference was obvious(P0.05), and the infection rate, adhesion of tendon and ankylosis rate in the observation group and in the control group were respectively 6.25%, 0.00%,0.00% and 18.75%, 10.41% and 6.25%, and the complication rate in the observation group was lower than that in the control group(P0.05), and the postoperative 24 h pains score in the observation group was obviously lower than that in the control group, [(2.5±0.2)points vs (3.1±0
文档评论(0)