护理质量对胶质瘤患者康复研究.docVIP

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
护理质量对胶质瘤患者康复研究

护理质量对胶质瘤患者康复研究   [摘要]目的 探讨护理质量对于胶质瘤患者康复过程中的影响及效果。方法 选取2013年1月~2016年1月在我院治疗的脑胶质瘤患者120例作为研究对象,将其分为护理组和对照组,各60例,对照组患者采用临床常规护理内容,护理组患者采用优质护理模式。比较不同护理内容实施后护理满意度、SDS评分以及SAS评分。结果 护理组患者满意度为98.3%,对照组满意度为70.0%,差异有统计学意义(P0.01)。SDS、SAS评分显示,护理后患者心理状态较护理前均有不同程度的提升,而护理后护理组SDS、SAS评分与对照组比较,差异有统计学意义(P0.01)。护理组患者护理后ECOG评分为(1.5±0.4)分,对照组护理后ECOG评分为(2.3±0.8)分,差异有统计学意义(t=6.928,P0.01)。结论 优质护理模式能提供给患者较高的护理质量,明显能改善患者的护理满意度,提高其依从性,有效改善患者心理和身体状态等康复效果,值得临床借鉴。   [关键词]护理质量;胶质瘤;心理状态;康复效果   [中图分类号] R739.41 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-4721(2017)02(b)-0191-03   [Abstract]Objective To explore the effect of nursing quality on the recovery of glioma patients.Methods 120 patients with glioma were treated in our hospital from January 2013 to January 2016,they were divided into nursing group and control group,60 cases in each group.The control group patients were treated with routine nursing contents,the nursing group patients were used high-quality care mode.The scores of nursing satisfaction,SDS score and SAS score of different nursing contents were compared.Results The satisfaction degree of the nursing group was 98.3%,and the satisfaction degree of the control group was 70.0%,the difference was significant (P0.01).SDS and SAS scores showed that the psychological status of patients after nursing care have different degrees of improvement.The SDS and SAS scores of nursing group were compared with control group,the difference was significant(P0.01).The ECOG score was (1.5±0.4) scores in the nursing group and the control group was (2.3±0.8)scores,with significant difference(t=6.928,P0.01).Conclusion The quality of care model can provide patients with higher quality of care,and can significantly improve patient care satisfaction,it improves their compliance,effectively improve the psychological and physical condition of patients and other rehabilitation effects,it is worthy of clinical reference.   [Key words]Nursing quality;Gliomas;State of mind;Rehabilitation effect   近年?恚?随着社会的发展以及人们生活方式的变化,临床上各类疾病发生率显著

文档评论(0)

317960162 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档