整形外科技术在患儿小面积深度烧伤创面整复中应用.docVIP

整形外科技术在患儿小面积深度烧伤创面整复中应用.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
整形外科技术在患儿小面积深度烧伤创面整复中应用

整形外科技术在患儿小面积深度烧伤创面整复中应用   [摘要]目的:探究?\用整形外科技术整复患儿小面积深度烧伤创面的疗效。方法:选取于2015年9月至2016年12月本院收治的67例小面积深度烧伤患儿作为本次研究试验对象,根据随机数字表法将患儿分成观察组和对照组,对照组33例患儿采用常规修复方法,观察组34例患儿采用整形外科技术实施修复,观察并记录两组患儿临床疗效、生活质量、一期愈合率、瘢痕增生以及感染等情况,分析比较。结果:观察组显效患儿23例,总有效率高达97.06%;对照组显效患儿15例,总有效率为84.84%,两组间差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。观察组患儿社会功能、精神健康、躯体疼痛以及生理机能等方面评分显著高于对照组患儿,生活质量明显提高,两组间差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。观察组患儿一期愈合率高达94.12%,瘢痕增生明显患儿2例,无感染现象,与对照组比较差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:小面积深度烧伤患儿采用整形外科手术治疗临床疗效更高,患儿创面愈合质量较好,美观性与功能兼具,患儿生活质量得到提高,值得广泛推荐应用于临床。   [关键词]小面积;深度烧伤;整形外科;疗效   [中图分类号]R622 [文献标志码]A [文章编号]1008-6455(2017)09-0028-03   Observation on Curative Effect of Small Area Deep Burn Wounds Treated with Orthopedic Technique   LI Bao,ZHANG Li-fang,LI Kai-wei, FEI Fu-jian   (Department of Neonate, The Central Hospital of Huangshi, Edong Medical Grope, Huangshi 435000, Hubei,China)   Abstract: Objective To explore the effect of orthopedic surgery to reconstruct the wound in children with small area of deep burn. Methods 67 cases of small area deep burn patients were selected from September 2015 to December 2016 in our hospital as the research subjects, according to the random number table method were divided into observation group 34 cases and control group 33 cases, control group treated with conventional repair method, the observation group was treated by plastic surgery technology to repair, and observe the quality of life records of two groups of clinical curative effect, and the rate of primary healing, scar hyperplasia and infection situation, analysis and comparison. Results The observation group with 23 cases, the total efficiency was 97.06%. 15 patients in control group were markedly effective, the total effective rate was 84.84%, there was significant difference between two groups (P0.05). The observation group with social function, mental health, physical pain and physical function scores were significantly higher than those in control group, the quality of life significantly increased, there was significant difference betwee

文档评论(0)

189****7685 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档