环磷酰胺与泼尼松联合治疗特发性间质性肺炎效果分析.docVIP

环磷酰胺与泼尼松联合治疗特发性间质性肺炎效果分析.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
环磷酰胺与泼尼松联合治疗特发性间质性肺炎效果分析

环磷酰胺与泼尼松联合治疗特发性间质性肺炎效果分析   [摘要]目的 研究?h磷酰胺与泼尼松联合治疗特发性间质性肺炎的临床效果。方法 选取2015年2月~2016年9月我院收治的60例特发性间质性肺炎患者作为研究对象,根据收治时间先后顺序将其分为对照组和观察组,每组各30例。对照组患者采用泼尼松治疗,观察组患者在对照组治疗基础上联合环磷酰胺进行治疗。观察对比两组患者的治疗总有效率、不良反应发生率、肺功能指标、治疗前后睡眠质量评分及生活质量评分。结果 观察组患者的治疗总有效率(96.67%)高于对照组(70.00%),不良反应发生率(6.67%)低于对照组(30.00%),各项肺功能指标(PEF、MVV、FVC)均高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。治疗后,观察组患者的睡眠质量评分低于对照组,生活质量评分高于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论 环磷酰胺与泼尼松联合治疗特发性间质性肺炎的效果优于单纯使用泼尼松,可有效改善患者的肺功能指标及预后效果,具有较高的临床推广价值。   [关键词]环磷酰胺;泼尼松;特发性间质性肺炎;不良反应;肺功能   [中图分类号] R974 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-4721(2018)4(b)-0127-03   Effect analysis of Cyclophosphamide and Prednisone in the treatment of idiopathic interstitial pneumonia   TAO Ying-fu   Fifth Department of Internal Medicine,Nancheng People′s Hospital in Fuzhou City,Jiangxi Province,Nancheng 344700,China   [Abstract]Objective To study the clinical efficacy of Cyclophosphamide and Prednisone in the treatment of idiopathic interstitial pneumonia.Methods Sixty patients with idiopathic interstitial pneumonia admitted in our hospital from February 2015 to September 2016 were selected as the study subjects.They were divided into control group and observation group according to the order of treatment time,with 30 cases in each group.In the control group,Prednisone alone was used,while in the observation group,on the basis of the control group,Cyclophosphamide was added.The total effectiveness rate,incidence of adverse reactions,pulmonary function indicators,sleeping quality score and quality of life score before and after treatment were observed and compared between the two groups.Results In the observation group,the total effectiveness rate was 96.67%,which was higher than that in the control group accounting for 70.00%,the incidence of adverse reactions was 6.67%,which was much lower than that in the control group accounting for 30.00%,the pulmonary function indexes (PEF,MVV,FVC) in the observation group were all higher than those in the control group,the differences were statistically signif

文档评论(0)

erterye + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档