种植修复治疗慢性牙周炎伴有牙列缺损临床效果研究.docVIP

种植修复治疗慢性牙周炎伴有牙列缺损临床效果研究.doc

此“医疗卫生”领域文档为创作者个人分享资料,不作为权威性指导和指引,仅供参考
  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
种植修复治疗慢性牙周炎伴有牙列缺损临床效果研究

种植修复治疗慢性牙周炎伴有牙列缺损临床效果研究   [摘要]目的 探讨种植修复在慢性牙周炎伴有牙列缺损治疗中的应用效果。方法 选取2015年1~12月种植修复的慢性牙周炎伴有牙列缺损患者50例作为观察组,再选取同时段接受牙种植的牙周健康者50例作为对照组。分析观察组患者治疗前后探诊深度及牙龈指数变化,并比较两组植入成功率及牙槽骨吸收情况。结果 观察组患者治疗前后探诊深度比较,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。观察组与6个月、1年植入保留率分别为88.0%、84.0%,对照组分别90.0%、88.0%,差异无统计学意义(P0.05);观察组负载6个月、1年牙槽骨吸收平均为(0.63±0.11)mm和(1.25±0.23)mm,对照组分别为(0.42±0.08)mm和(1.01±0.12)mm,观察组略微高于对照组,差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。结论 种植修复在慢性牙周炎伴牙列缺损患者的临床治疗中具有较好的应用效果,能够恢复患者的生理功能,提高其生活质量,值得在临床中推广应用。   [关键词]种植修复;慢性牙周炎;牙列缺损;临床疗效   [中图分类号] R781.4+2 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-4721(2017)02(b)-0109-03   [Abstract]Objective To explore the effect of application of implantation repair therapy in the treatment of chronic periodontitis with dentition defect.Methods Altogether 50 chronic periodontitis patients with dentition defect who were treated from January to December 2015 were selected as observation group,and then 50 cases of periodontal healthy people who received dental implant in the same period were selected as control group.The pre-operative and post-operative changes in probing depth and gingival index of observation group were analyzed,and the success rate and alveolar resorption of the two groups were compared.Results The study found that pre-operative and post-operative probing depth of observation group had significant difference (P0.05).The implant retention rate of observation group in the first 6 months and the first year was 88.0%,84.0%,control group was 90.0%,88.0% respectively,without significant difference between the two groups(P0.05);the average alveolar resorption of observation group and control group in the first 6 months and the first year were (0.63±0.11) mm,(1.25±0.23) mm,control group was (0.42±0.08) mm,(1.01±0.12) mm,respec?tively;the observation group was slightly higher than that of control group,but the difference was not significant (P0.05).Conclusion Application of implantation repair therapy has better effect in clinical treatment of chronic periodontitis patients with dentition defect,which can re

文档评论(0)

130****9768 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档